Nike Air Zoom Total 90

This boot is a shocker! Only worn it 3 times but has given me the worst blisters I've ever had (to the balls of my feet and the heels), so now getting rid of them on ebay and replacing with Puma Kings, a much more comfortable boot. The air zooms look really nice and I got them for £20 (rrp supposedly £120) but they've been really disappointing. Interestingly a friend of mine bought the same pair at the same time and has had the same problems; he is also selling them! Avoid!

The Nike Air Zoom Total 90 are nice but price is very.costly

The Nike Air Zoom Total 90 are awesome boots. The boots are very comfortable and they have a nice deign. I found that they give a really clean finish as well

The Nike Air Zoom Total 90 boots are really great boots to wear. They are not too thick but also not too thin. Mine are really great fitting and comfortable. They are a nlittle bit heavy but thats nothing major.

They look and feel great, awesome boots.

Not good just got some nike vapor and there sweet what is the point in waisting time on rubbish like this?

Insanely mint boots, i want a pair of Nike Air Zoom total 90

It improved my overall shot and the accuracy of it. do not wear them in the rain, because they get heavy and uncomfortable

These boots are great, they look great and are really comfortable. I feel that they have improved my control and game as a whole, they are great for running in and I would definitely recommend the Nike Air Zoom Total 90's they are awesome boots.

I've bought this boot before and I did not like the colour or the grip. I kept slipping. They had no grip.

90's are now as ubiquitous as any other boot at any time. This is largely down to superior marketing and a massive market share effort by Nike, flooding the market, saturating supply, and therefore providing a superior brand (at least in terms of desirability) at a low price. Fair play to them pushing the lower end of the market in this way, to counter Adidas and Puma with their Predator/King offerings, which were ludicrously expensive when the boot itself costs a couple of quid to make, or thereabouts.

Not sure Nike can take all the credit though, as some of the supply and price competitiveness is due entirely to the budget sports shops in the UK getting their hands on enough stock to cause a price war.

This has all been going on for a couple of years now, and I'm sure anyone who's tried to buy some boots or astro's in that time recognizes what I'm saying.

As for the product, well despite any reputation sports manufacturers might have, and avoiding any commentary on the ethical labor debate, the 90 range seems to do the job pretty nicely. I have a set of screw in boots, which have lasted a season and a half on England's muddy parks, and which I bought for a song in a discount sports store.

The astro's I have are fine but wear a bit on the upper instep for some reason, but no worse than other brands. I'd say you do get a good product for a very good price now, but of course this is due to the amount of supply, and next year when Nike (or whoever) launch a new range of something else, all the marketing and production money will be in that.

My vote is always to avoid the fads - let's face it a boot is a boot is a boot - stay a year behind the new products, get yourself leather boots for 20 quid, and you can say in most cases you've done well.

Nike don't make better boots than anyone else, I'm sure, but right now their 90's represent great value and are certainly good enough for regular competitive standard. I'm pretty pleased with my 90's. Lamentably, however, they didn't make me a better footballer (though thankfully they didn't make me any worse either).

Tip for boot manufacturers - Black is fine guys, really. When you get to a certain age... black is fine. Thanks!