
Technics SUVX700
Features
Sound Quality
Value For Money
Technics SUVX700
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.

User Reviews
Sound Quality
Features
Value For Money
Best Amp I Have Ever Had
I still own it since 1991. has problems with volume, need to increase volume to get both channels working. and some dirt in input selectors.
I look forward to having it fixed since its the best i have had.
I had the same issue - it was a dirty input selector - a quick spray of DeoxIT D5 followed by excercising it and all issies resolve.
An absolutely cracking Amp
Sound Quality
Features
Value For Money
Nice Non-boom Bass
I have owned two vx500s, two vx600s and have now just purchased the vx700.
All have been purchased second hand and then re-sold within the last 4 years.
The vx700 is by far the best sound quality of the 3 models enabling me to use it in 'power amp direct' mode without the base boom that the others produce in this mode (speakers I am using are Monitor Audio Bronze BR2). The sheer size and weight of the 700 is greater too so beware of using it in a shallow hifi cabinet as it could be too deep to close the glass door.
I have owned many Technics and other Japanese amps and the VX700 performs by far the best. You can pick one up on Ebay for anything between £130 and £400. Mine os in mint condition and came with manual and original box /packing.
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
I've Owned My Technics Su Vx-700 Since 1991 And It
I've owned my Technics SU VX-700 since 1991 and it has performed ever since. I'm really pleased with it.
I've got one question and hopefully there's one who knows yhe answer.
The input and output selectors seems to be not fully connected because the sound from the speakers are interfered. This can be fixed by turning the selectors from one side to the other. But this only fixes it for some time.
Any tips on how to fix this? Can it be because of durt and dust?
I had the same issue -
it was a dirty input selector -
a quick spray of DeoxIT D5 followed by excercising it and all issues resolve. Note the selectors are slider type on the certical board inside the Amp
An absolutely cracking Amp -
I run it with 2x Kef reference series 101 and 2x Technics SB-CS95 for the bass
Hi buddy!
Hi Buddy, hope you have your amp already fixed and hoping you can also help me because i am facing problem with my Technics Su-VX700 i has the same problem as your. can you help me plase! Thanks in advance Jorge!
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
Technics Is No Match For Any Audio System. I Am St
Technics is no match for any audio system. I am still using the 1970 su-8044 model. I am really surprised to see even after 30 years, I am not able to find a match for technics amplifiers. Great quality product. Well recommend Technics SUVX700.
Have the SU-V8X 1985 Still in perfect condition! Have played to many major parties... I love Technics! (had it from new).
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
Technics Su-vx700: I Have Owned Many Technics Amps
Technics SU-VX700: I have owned many Technics amps and other audio equipment in the past, so buying the SU-VX700 second hand seemed to be a good move. I plugged it in and fired it up and it appears to live up to Technics fame. Plenty of punch and it sounds good too. People seem too ready to discard their straight forward amps in favour of Home Theatre amps because of the extra channels and all the "sound effects" and bells and whistles they have, but, when it comes to good clean HiFi audio reproduction, 9 out of 10 of these home theatre amps/receivers just can't foot the bill (live up to their claims), no matter what the brand name. Technics have been around for a very long time now and most of their amps have certainly set a hard pace to keep up with, given their lowish prices (bang per buck - so to speak). I have noticed too, that some of their amps get a little warm and there has been the odd problem with some of them cutting out as they warn up - some almost hot enough to fry eggs on, but, no such event with the SU-VX700 as it stayed cool all the time. This is usually due to the way the output transistors fire. In the past, with Technics amps, there has been an abundance of real punchy bass and a "loudness" button to boot. Although the VX700 has a loudness button, the bass seems to be a little less punchy than my last amp I had but as the much lower bass is required, it soon appears right on queue. I suspect Technics have a much better amp here than some of the earlier models I have owned as it seems to have removed any over emphasis on boomy bass in favour off more accurate bass reproduction.
It is a big amp and has massive cooling fins and a few large capacitors inside it and looks like it was made for real business.
I would suggest that you treat this amp with care as it, like many other amps, is part of a dying breed which has been all but superseded by home theatre amps. Not good for the true audio enthusiast. Home theatre amps just don't cut it. True amps like The SU-VX700 do..!!!
A footnote to my above comment in the "bad points" section...
The Graphic EQ was "very" easy to add in, especially with the input and record selector switches... Simply place the EQ on Tape 1 in/out sockets (or Tape 2, I guess) then select which input device you wish to listen to and select Tape 1 in the record switch. Just like that...
I grow more impressed with this amp by the day...
Value For Money
This Is A Pretty Amazing Amplifier Giving Out 690w
This is a pretty amazing amplifier giving out 690W. I am very impressed only it doesn't have a remote control, but then it makes up for that with the shear output this 'baby' gives. Well done for technics!
This is not an output figure! It may be the power consumption but the output is 90 watts per channel RMS into 8 ohms.
I have a Technics SU-VX700 and it's bad... If you have the blue print you can to contact me on the hifi forum.
I agree - if it was to run at 690 watts constantly, it would run very hot. The power-consumption is measured when running at full throttle - max power. When used at moderate levels it would probably run at about 200 watt/consumption. Many people are mistaken about the numbers and accidently thinks that the number on the back is an indication of how powerfull the amplifier is.
Thanks for that Runin....I never thought of the power CONSUMPTION. Y'know, a 690 watts firebar would go a long way towards heating a small room!
None of it. It is the power-consumption that is stated to 690 watts. It has absolutely nothing to do with reality. The SU-VX700 is from the early nineties and the poweroutput was stated as 2x90 watts/8 ohms.
Q&A
There are no questions yet.