Biased BBC www.biasedbbc.org

Click here if this is your business
Biased BBC www.biasedbbc.org
★★☆☆☆
2.1
43.0% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Ease Of Navigation

  • Value For Money

? Ask our helpful community of experts about this product or company
Biased BBC www.biasedbbc.org - Ask a question now

Media Gallery for Biased BBC www.biasedbbc.org

Refine your search

  • Average Rating Over Time
  • Within the last month ***** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 6 months *** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 12 months * (From 0 reviews)

Latest Reviews

“Do I have to give this site even one star?”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 21/03/2013

Imagine Alf Garnett, but less subtle and you have a picture of many of the contributors to Biased BBC. The unemployed are all scroungers, public sector workers all lazy and unions are for people who can't stand on their own feet. In this strange world David Cameron is a liberal, even a closet socialist. Michael Heseltine is not fit to speak on behalf of the Tory party because he "stabbed Thatcher in the back". And then there's the casual racism... But of course it's primarily the BBC that these guys abhor. As zealots they bravely expose themselves to the evil broadcaster to chronicle the torrent of left wing, multi-cultural, pro-Europe, anti capitalism, Daily Mail hating, Mugabe loving, Climate Change propaganda they would have us believe oozes out of every BBC pore. Accuracy is not a strong point in their rantings. Often the wilder the claims the more “likes” the poster gets. Challenge someone and ask for facts and at best you get ignored. More likely you'll be in for a dose of abuse. You have been warned.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 3

“Self important, rude, ill-informed, bigoted nonsense”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 29/05/2012

I followed a link, ironically from the site itself (which by the way has moved to biased-bbc.com) to this site to see what other people had written about it. There seems to be a consensus - it is terrible. What an absolutely dysfunctional collection of malcontents, ill informed, prejudiced people congregate on that site. It is impossible to single out any one contributor for special mention since they are all universally ill informed, but I suppose the site's owner, one David Vance, must shoulder the blame. His modus operandi consists of making some entirely unsupported statement and then waiting for his followers to all fall in line to agree with him. There is no debate, dissent is not tolerated. Every now and then someone will attempt to point out a Jupiter-sized hole in their arguments (and I use that term its most extended sense); they will be met by a torrent of ad hominem abusive comments. Don't bother, they won't thank you. None of them have the first idea how the media works, perhaps one of them at one time worked in a newsroom, but that doesn't stop all of them pontificating away as if they are experts. All it does is to reveal their ignorance. Do not go to this site expecting informed debate, evidence, a balanced sensible interpretation. Do go to this site if you want to see prejudice, xenophobia, homophobia, racism and bigotry. It shouldn't take you long to find examples of all of them.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 2 3

“I find this B-BBC absolutely hilarious, and for that...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 25/03/2011

I find this B-BBC absolutely hilarious, and for that reason, and that reason alone, I thoroughly recommend it. The level of "analysis" is roughly on a par with that you would find in your local near closing time. My cat provides more intelligent commentary.
There is an unintentionally hysterical woman called Sue who perceives herself to be some great media analyst. In fact all she does in her "analysis" is reveal her woeful understanding of the media.
The site appears to be run by David Vance, a very angry failed Northern Ireland politician who was humiliated at the general election. Perhaps his need for a scapegoat for his own shortcomings has lead to this site.
But I do encourage you to read it. Seriously if you want a very good laugh at the expense of a collection of the most ill-informed, self-justifying, pedantic, ignorant group, then you will find few better sources than this site.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Guest's Comment

Written on: 04/07/2011

This reviewer obviously wouldn't dare try to debate any of the posts on the blog. "Ill-informed" means "They don't agree with me". You can be assured this reviewer will never be able to prove any of the accusations made here. Just a bit of hate speech from the Left.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 3 3

“Excellent site. ”

★★★★★

written by balls1 on 16/03/2011

Excellent site.
A much needed watchdog of the editorialising agenda pushing going on daily in BBC news reporting.

Covers multiple issues and makes it points clearly. Do visit the site, you'll not be disappointed.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 3 3

“Biased BBC represents an opportunity missed. A...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 12/03/2011

Biased BBC represents an opportunity missed. A publicly funded body should be held accountable and must uphold rigorous standards of impartiality. The problem with biased bbc is that it does not seek a rational debate but attcks the BBC form an entirely right wing perspective. I had a long look at the site the other day and engaged in debate with a regular, American contributor. To be fair discourse was civil and it touched whether Obama is Left wing or of the centre. Like I say I enjoyed the discussion but the problem was the whole debate was framed by the contributor's claim that a BBC correspondent was lying when she said in a report that Obama was of the centre. The narrative here being"The BCC (or the "Beeboids") are left wing and deliberately lie about politics to confound us." Sure enough other contributions to the thread included terms such as "Cryptocommunist" that Obama won in 2008 "cos he's black" and bizarreley that nazis were really socialists and any attempt to say other wise is part of the liberal rewriting of history. Biased BBC basically means not right wing. Its a shame. I'm not of the left and think a number of these people have pretty sane and decent values. But the ferocity with which they attack those with whom they disagree, is extreme in itself.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 2

“Awful blog unfortunately with a well founded meaning...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 19/09/2010

Awful blog unfortunately with a well founded meaning for existence. Caught completely up in its own perceived self importance. Really is a shame that this blog is so hideously lacking because if they cut out half the supposed arguments, childish nit-picking and bias of their own, this could be a good attempt to expose BBC bias. Clearly to most other people aside from its own contributors and a couple of naive journo's at the Daily Mail who are desperate for any quote possible, it doesn't live up to its intentions. If I was a betting man, i'd put my house on their being a great proportion of Daily Mail readers posting comments and very few Telegraph type contributors. That may be harsh on some contributers, but thats the impression i get. Just because something is left of the Daily Mail, its certainly doesn't make something left wing.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 3

“An excellent blog which daily points out the left wing...”

★★★★★

written by on 09/09/2010

An excellent blog which daily points out the left wing bias of the BBC. The current Director-General of the BBC, Mark Thompson, recently stated that "'In the BBC I joined 30 years ago [as a production trainee, in 1979] there was, in much of current affairs, in terms of people's personal politics, which were quite vocal, a massive bias to the Left". But we're supposed to believe this bias doesn't exist now. The Biased BBC blog proves otherwise.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 2 1

“Don't scratch the surface on this blog, you'll only...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 31/08/2010

Don't scratch the surface on this blog, you'll only find the same blinkered ignorance as on most other internet blogs. Although the idea for the blog is sound - there is a genuine cause for highlighting bias in BBC's news reporting - sadly the articles and particularly the comments turn into a BBC witchhunt. I get the feeling that whatever the BBC does, right or wrong, the contributors to this blog will hate it.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Jackzero's Comment

Written on: 16/03/2011

Nonsense

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 2

“I found this blog whilst trying to further research...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 25/04/2010

I found this blog whilst trying to further research examples of BBC bias. Unfotunately i didn't find much of worth here, which suprised me giving the supposed intention of the blog. Its just one of those blogs where mierable people congregate and have eventually forgotten what they were supposed to be talking about. Its a little bit like a daily mail blog would be - forgotten what their original point was and just firing off contradictory bile in all directions at any target, making things up along the way. Personally i wish the BBC was less biased and whilst i was trawling through the openblog nonsense, i was looking for some examples of bias - i was not looking for nicknames for bbc reporters (more evidence of daily mail-ness) calling them ugly (i'm sure our right wing reporters are of similar appearance), nitpicking over the Mail publishing a story and the BBC not for a couple of hours. Instead of waiting for the BBC to cover it they simply proclaim that the delay is simply because they're lefties and other such nonsensical tripe. Thats a further mail trait picked up by this blog - anyone that disagrees with our (supposedly collective) opinions on thing like the bbc must be a lefty bbc luvvie. Well the BBC is often wrong, but this blog is more frequently wrong so the chances of you being labelled a lefty bbc luvvie by the biased bbc angry mob (of the unemployable) is going to be frequent. I'd rather discuss the bbc bias in a constructive way where we can disagree without being childishly nicknamed as such - especially when i'd much rather the bbc was either streamlined or broken up completely. Give this blog a widebirth (unless your a mailite nutter). Unfortunate as the topic that should be being discussed should be far more prevailant today

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 2

“This is probably one of the worst blogs out there,...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by on 11/04/2010

This is probably one of the worst blogs out there, which genuinely is dissapointing considering what the content should be. The title would make you think its a blog about the bbc being biased. What it appears to actually be is group of biased daily mail readers used to lapping up daily anti bbc stories in that paper. The result is that the blog is full of half facts - people saying the bbc haven't covered a story which, after a quick bbc search, shows their point to be false or with a little logical thinking you can see that the story or their take on a story is completely baseless. Counter their arguments or state something that counters their argument and all you are told is that your a lefty, a troll or are you are accused of working for the BBC. You could counter that they work for the Mail or rupert murdoch, but i wouldn't lower myself to their low standards. Quite often you will add a reply and they visibly become aggitated that you don't agree with them by attempting to belittle you but 95% of the time use childish insults. A blog showing genuine bias of the BBC would be interesting and worth a read and contributing to - this blog 97% of the time appears to be anything but that. Unfortunate

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 2

“This site fulfills an unfortunately necessary role. It...”

★★★★★

written by Jonnnboy on 10/09/2008

This site fulfills an unfortunately necessary role. It highlights some of the deficiency in the standards of BBC journalism. Clear and succint analysis of the liberal bias foisted upon the taxpayer.
The site is updated almost every day.
The general comments sections can be quite funny at times.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 3 1

“Biased BBC is curiously misnamed. It's only interested...”

☆☆☆☆☆

written by nebneb on 20/01/2008

Biased BBC is curiously misnamed. It's only interested in forcing a hard right agenda on the BBC and consequently the moderators and commenters tend to see left wing bias everywhere.

It's not uncommon to see posters blame the BBC for all manner or ills in the world and to see the BBC as a communal meeting place for nefarious left wing types plotting world domination, the installation of a 21st century caliphate and the annihilation of Israel.

And then there's the BNP contingent among the commenters that seem to ebb and flow in. It's always amusing to see the hasbara types find common ground with the commenters who see the reporter being marginalised and the BBC failing to face up to the plain facts: especially the Islamic ones.

Quite apart from that, moderators and posters alike have such limited understanding of the journalistic process that some of the example of "bias" they find are so laughable it always makes me wonder how they return the next day to declare that the BBC has no idea about journalism compared to their obvious expertise.

The best things you can say are that it gives the commenters, many of whom are, if not unemployed then clearly have a lot of time on their hands, something to do.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Djferros's Response to nebneb's Review

Written on: 28/01/2008

Suggested Reading... Can we trust the BBC?

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Barneyk's Response to nebneb's Review

Written on: 31/08/2010

I found this review very helpful because it confirms exactly what I read on the blog in question. Pro-war, xenophobic, nationalistic and often laughably ignorant of the facts.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Jonnnboy's Response to nebneb's Review

Written on: 10/09/2008

I found this review unhelpful because...it does the usual BBC trick of assuming that the left wing is always correct despite the facts.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

392561_Oggem's Response to nebneb's Review

Written on: 16/08/2008

Can you prove your claim that most posters are unemployed or that any of them are BNP members?

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 3

“The BBC is so biased we pay tax for it!! ”

★★★☆☆

written by djferros on 02/04/2007

The BBC is so biased we pay tax for it!!

At least someone at Biased BBC is trying to show people this.

Keep up the good work.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Jonnnboy's Response to djferros's Review

Written on: 10/09/2008

I agree with this review because it short but accurate.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 0

“Who shall guard the guards themselves? ”

★★★★☆

written by The Hooded Claw on 03/08/2005

Who shall guard the guards themselves?

Found this site Biased BBC during the Gulf war when I was dissapointed by the horrendously partisan ultra-liberal studio coverage of the issues at the BBC. The on the ground reporters were very good but apart from Newsnight the BBC was awful.

I went to the font of all knowledge and typed in 'bbc bias' and up came this. Just checked it recently for the first time in 2 years and it is still running.

It has some very interesting articles on the various issues that relate to the presentation of news by the BBC, it provides insights into the BBC's presentation of events that would not be apparant if you just saw/heard the BBC output. Even more importantly it raises awareness of the political/intellectual assumptions that underpin the world view that the people who have come to run the BBC want you to believe exists.

Call them what you like ultra liberal, social marxists or liberal marxist - they will probably hate it but make your own mind up.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Djferros's Response to The Hooded Claw's Review

Written on: 09/05/2007

Very true...also with the religious issues on the BBC.
<br/>
<br/>They seems to love antichristian issues... and love promuslim issues.. it's really strange!

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 0

Do you have a question about this product or company? Simply type it in the box below and one of our community will give you an answer

Our helpful community of likeminded people will be happy to answer any questions that you have.

Thanks for asking a question.

Once we've checked over your question we will put it live on the site and our strong community of experts will hopefully give you some great answers that you find useful.

We will email you when the question is on the site

overview