written by on 25/01/2014
I have a 2007 Honda VT750c (aero in the US) with 9000 km on the clock. I've done 3000 km on it. I was looking for a mid-size bike - 500cc, maybe 600 cc, when I saw one of these at the bike shop and despite the weight and being a 750, I took it for a ride. And immediately loved it. The power is mild. Lazy. The ride quality is good. The cornering is easy. I can't believe that a 750 can be such a mild thing. It's an excellent bike for the open road. The best things: the smooth, easy, mild power of the engine. The quiet exhaust, the seat, the high quality chrome. The styling is really good (some people hate it, but I love it). The paint is very good. The worst things: bars are too low, the exhaust is too heavy and ugly, and there are too many plastic parts. I've ridden the 2004 and the 2007. The seat on the 04 isn't nearly as good as the 07. Otherwise, they're quite similar. I didn't like the standard exhaust because is is very heavy and very quiet. So heavy that if you ride no-hands, you have to lean WAY over to the left to compensate for the weight of the exhaust. It really can't be good to be continuously counter-steering to compensate for an unbalanced bike. I've now got much lighter Vance and Hines short shots*. In my opinion they look a lot better, too. The controls are all good. The front brake is good, and the back brake is ok. I am a bit tempted to change the bars. They are quite low and forward, which encourages slouching. I like to sit upright (Arnie style) and the bars end about 5 cm short and 5 cm too low for me. Because I ride sitting up, I put a lot of weight on my spine and buhm and need a good seat. This seat is excellent. Not too hard and not too soft. The back suspension does a good job of softening the bumps, too. The front forks are ok, but have some 'stickion' (static friction, that holds the fork before letting the fork move). Maybe a change to lighter fork oil will help? The gearing on the bike is interesting. Not great, but not bad, either. First gear is reasonably high, so some dragging of the clutch is needed for an uphill take-off. Two, three, four are good. Around town I can purr along in 4th gear or have some power available in 3rd (@60 km/hour). Fourth gear takes me up to 100 km/hour. But the change to 5th doesn't drop the revs much. It would be good to have a slightly higher 5th gear. The advantage of the current setup is that it gets over reasonable hills with changing down to fourth. The drivetrain is as solid as a rock. 100% high quality components. I have no doubt that everything will last for years and tens of thousands of km. I didn't expect to find so many 'chrome' plastic parts on the bike. It's not a cheap bike. It surely wouldn't have hurt to put some more metal bits on the bike, and especially on the engine. I've tinkered a bit with the tuning, and found it easy to work on the engine. A luggage rack has been a handy addition to the sissy bar. Also a small windshield to make longer rides more comfortable. Although I've concentrated on the negatives, there are a million reasons to ride this bike. It is solid as a rock. The quality is great. Some people will want more power, but I say that there are other bikes (and other sports) for them. I'm looking forward to owning the bike for a long time and touring extensively on it. Cheers. * I've changed a few things, including the exhaust. I went for Vance and Hines short shots. Mine were badly made and too loud, but are ok with quiet baffles in them. The bad welding messed with the fitting of the quiet baffle. No Asian manufacturer, and certainly not Honda, would ever sell anything as bad as my Vance and Hines pipes.
written by on 16/10/2012
Love the fit, ride, excellent mpg. Did not like the front grill guard being absent, causing a rock/radiator leak...husband made one, and later year models came with the guard equipped. Oil leak at this high mileage but fixable, and I've gotten my fourth set of tires today. Would like better tires to come with the new bike. Bridgestones are poor quality, especially in a wet climate. Overall great bike, with some tweaks it would be excellent.
written by gazza883 on 02/08/2011
It doesn't matter who Honda claims the VT750S is likely to buy the the bike, you'll either love it or hate it. If Harley still made the Sportster XL883, with the spoked wheels that it turned out through the nineties and early 2000s, then the VT750S would sell far fewer. Harley doesn't, so that's Honda's gain. A thousand miles after picking the machine up I felt it was time to give to write a review. Spoked chrome wheels are class, they are a pain to keep clean, but nothing says motorcycle to blokes of a certain age than spokes. Honda has built a simple bike. It's not a cruiser, its a 'proper motorbike'. Engine, wheels, frame, tank.. that's it. It's deserves the tag retro simply because it's what you would have bought in the 1960s. So you can have the classic look, without having to check the bolts every time you park up. The tank, in the Honda red, white and blue, is simple and gorgeous and even though it holds just 10.7 litres, it'll take you 120 miles before the warning light comes on and there's another two litres in reserve giving you around 25 miles until to find fuel. Surprised? I was, but for the first 1,000 miles I've worked out the consumption and it's seen a maximum from a tank of 67 mpg (imperial gallons, that's 56 mpg in the USA)and a low of 58, which is spectacular. During the first 100 miles I feared that 44hp wasn't going to be enough, but as the engine loosened up it's clear that the VT has plenty of power for normal road conditions and she'll cruise at an indicated 80mph without problem. The speedo over reads by about 2mph at an indicated 60. (Flat out she'll show 100 on the clock which I may well have done with my son on the back when we were desperate to get home quickly, or I may not have done if there is any likelihood of incriminating myself) I don't subscribe to all this 'I felt like a parachute' nonsense anyway (well not up to an indicated 80). If you are sitting at a PC now reading this, hold your hands out in front of you at just below shoulder height and that's the riding position. It is perfect and if you can't ride this bike comfortably for an hour in that position at around 70, then it's time to quit bikes eh? (Note: on 700 miles, came home after three hours riding, the last half hour at indicated 80-85, and my neck muscles took a bit of a battering. At 70 the VT's fine, over that and you are pulling yourself forward. Fun and enjoyable but a screen is going to be vital for the planned Euro tour later this year.) The seat looks lovely though it is pretty useless for a full size pillion, and gets a little uncomfortable after an hour or so for the rider. But shift your backside a little and it's ok again. But over the weekend away along the south coast I had two five-hour riding days and I was still able to walk at the end and my fingers hadn't swollen at the joints as they used to on the Sportster thanks to the vibes. The VT is perfectly comfortable. I weigh 13 stone (Americans work it out for yourself, 14lbs in a stone) and I'm 5ft 10ins. It fits me fine and I'm not getting any younger and sports bikes hurt my knees. I am considering a single seat replacement but, if I can stand the ribbing from less sympathetic mates, I do intend to try a recently purchased sheepskin cover. My girlfriend is 5ft 4ins, loves it and is already on the point of selling her beloved CBR600F to buy something similar. The bike needs riding properly, little flick of counter steer going into a bend,lean, set it up and gently accelerate through the bend, it's an easy bike to ride and immensely satisfying to chuck through a series of S bends. Slower than a sports bike but just as enjoyable because you know unless you are on a race track, you are nowhere near testing the ability of most post 100 bhp machines so achievement aboard them needs far harder riding (come on, I've seen a few of you boys in the PowerRangers' leathers with squared tyres and anyone who rides on the roads like they do at Brands Hatch wants shooting). The brakes are perfectly adequate. The rear drum has been criticised by some testers for not being a disc, like most machines these days, but I like it for two reasons. Firstly it looks a whole heap better than a disc and blends beautifully with the spoked wheel (easier to clean the hub too). Secondly, you don't have to be too delicate with the pedal. I like the long travel but there's no danger of locking up the rear even in an emergency (and its lovely for controlling your turn if you go into a bend that tightens, a little too fast. Handy see?). No one's going to claim the ride it plush. The front suspension is definitely slightly under-damped (but felt fine two up) and if you accelerate hard banked over and hit a bump, or cat's eye, and the steering gives a little nod though it retains balance thanks to the gyroscopic effect of the 19-inch front wheel which keeps you running in the right direction. And at the back, even which the twin shocks on their softest pre-load number one setting (two is recommended one up), you know when you've hit a bump. But it's never dangerous nor particularly upsetting for the rider and many sports bike boys will envy the fact that Britain's potholed rods hold no fear for the VT750 rider. (I live in Kent which has got to have the crappiest road maintenance in Britain - 4x4s are chosen down here for their on-road ability). Ordinary folk and wannabe motorcyclists love the Honda. I've had more people speak to me in the last couple of months as I've filled up with petrol and parked that I have in the past three years with a Suzuki B-King, Yamanha V-Max and Honda Fireblade. It's exactly the sort of bike that makes non bike owners want to speak to you because it fits their idea of what an old motorbike should look like. They're wrong but that's the effect. I have a mate who wouldn't buy a Honda if it was the only bike on earth. He's wrong too. Honda's build quality is in my experience still the best in the market, though the VT's switchgear looks a little bit cheap. But the company has a genuine 50-year heritage and an un-matched record of innovation and revolution in the motorcycle market (CB72, CB750, CBX1000, CX500, CBR600F, CBR900... the Goldwing). So as Honda has a bike heritage to match and better almost everyone. The VT750 can trace its parentage back to the VT500 of the eighties. That bike, an 'all-rounder which sold in droves to couriers in the UK, replaced the CX500 (which couriers loved more). The Shadow custom has been around since '83 first as a 600 and now 750 using that same motor. Some of the early incarnations suffered from the Japanese interpretation of a custom which looked a little odd, but Hondas always looked less awakward than the efforts of rivals: think Kawasaki EN500 or some of the eighties Yamaha Viragos. For other uses of the lump, check out that other couriers' favourite from the late eighties the NTV600/650 or look at all the tourer most people will really ever need, the NT650V/NT700V Deauville and for the adventure crowd see the cheap Long Way Round machine, the Transaplp 600/650/700. So VT owners should have I have no fears that this new bike will be reliable in the engine department. Three valves a cylinder and, unusually, twin plugs in each, in a low state of tune should equal economy (tick box) and reliability. By comparison I reckon this motor is more torquey than the carbed 883 Sportster lump which, even with the necessary Stage 1 pipes and carb sort out, still needed more gear changes for rapid progress. I might be wrong though as a couple of American magazines last year remained convinced the cheapest Sporty still wins over the VT750S. I owned a 2001 XL883 for five years, took it all over Europe and it's only problem in 13,000-odd miles was two snapped drive belts. In straight road test fights now by the US mags, the VT750RS is still quicker on the road than the comparably priced (in the US) Sportster Low, with it's new un-Sportster shaped tank and alleged higher power. As an aside, I'm not anti-Harley, I genuinely love the bikes and appreciate their place in the world. But I hate the snobbery which the vast majority of riders seem to bring to the marque, the marketing machine which really has sucked everyone in... and those crappy belt drives, which remains one of the bike world's biggest swindles. Yes belts have much to recommend them - shock absorption, without the complexity of a shaft and no need to oil like a chain - but reliability isn't one of them. I've never had a broken chain, but I've spend £350 in a couple of years with H-D replacing two belts. So, unless there is absolutely no way a small stone can get to the belt, I'll always be wary of belt drive, whatever fans claim for longevity. For those of you who haven't checked yet the VT750S is chain drive though the pricier VT750C, with its lower seat, fat front tyre and 'dark' custom theme retains the shaft. This year I'd already decided I wanted another V-twin and the Sportster was the natural choice really: simple, rugged and a kind of horse for the road which you can load up with a bit of luggage and cross a couple of countries at you own pace. But a few weeks ago I'm was blatting past the Honda dealer in Hastings and a pretty red, white an blue tank catches my eye. Turn around to take a look and the decision is made. A £300 discount and zero per cent finance with 10 per cent down over three years helped the decision ... well it was rude not to buy it. The Tricolour VT750S is new for 2011. It's a £300 premium over the gunmetal of last year (we don't get it in white like the States) and I think it looks better than the 2010 model, which continues this year. First surprise: the deep metallic blue coloured mudguards are made of plastic... the black side panels are made of plastic and the pretty paintwork on the tank looks lovely but the paint is not that deep - it's white with laquered blue and red stripe transfers. I know because mine was chipped on the day I went to pick it up. Honda in fairness did replace it and the paint is actually pretty tough and my tank bag left no marks. The exhausts dominate the right hand side of the machine in a semi shotgun style (copyright H-D) but it's an illusion because just below the passenger footrest the two pipes are linked. And there is a huge catalytic converter boosting the temperature in the area to something similar to the surface of the sun. My lad's boots left rubber scuff marks, I burned a hole in my bike cover and I've melted the ends of a cargo net. All new bikes have to have a cat but the VT's is very easy to touch, so beware, it gets extremely hot. The rest of the exhaust is double skinned, chromed and shows no sign of blueing after 1,000 miles (doubtless because it's double skinned, duh). Ideally I'd like to replace the pipes with something after-market and save them for MOT time in 2015 when I could bolt em back on. I've banged on about Honda quality, I'm still not sure about the exhausts though. I can see inside the silencer a few signs of rust, small but I guess the mild steel inside and the hidden - but only painted - plumbing linking the two pipes and the cat, may well be the first part of the bike to succumb to rust. Between 50 and 90mph you will want for nothing on this bike... roll the throttle in any gear and she responds with a lovely rumble. If you want a Sunday afternoon machine for gentle ride outs, it wins, if you want economic head turning transport that'll do a bit of touring too if required, it wins, and if you just love the look of it, then it wins. Fundamentally the VT750S is an economy motorcycle in many ways. It's cheap, it's functional and none of the other manufacturers offer anything exceptionally better for the cash. Incidentally, 2010 pre-registered models are still available for £4,999, which makes it a bargain. Other retro bikes are available of course. Take a look at the Triumph Bonneville, the Moto Guzzi V7 and the new Kawasaki W800 (beautifully detailed with a rear drum too... but a grand more than the VT750S in Britain), which out Bonnevilles the Bonneville for sixties period charm and quality. Remember Triumphs are not really Triumphs in the same way Indian is not really Indian, so in many ways the Kawasaki, which was making a 650 vertical twin in the sixties, is more authentic than the Bonneville as a retro bike any way. So, to conclude: If you want a machine which is simple, with a sensible seating position, that feels like a motorcycle (though the vibes are nothing like any 60s big twin), decently made (in Japan as well, surprisingly), with a two-year warranty, that should retain a decent used value, you could do a lot worse than the VT750S.
Written on: 20/09/2013
Excellent and comprehensive review sir. Your words inspired me to try a red white and blue model and practically everything you said rang true....
The only issue I have is that it is still too slow for me. I switched from sportsbikes a few years ago to 'street' machines and now have a Yamaha FZ1N (bad back). I was surprised at the lack of 'grunt' from Honda's twin and even more surprised that they had managed to get so little horsepower from a 750 cc engine.
I'm not a lunatic and the 'real world' riding speeds mentioned above suffice most of the time for me too. However, how you get there is still a smile-inducing experience and whilst I have to say the VT750 ticks a lot of boxes, it is lacking in the muscle department for us.
Put an extra 20 HP in the engine and I'll arrange for delivery tomorrow!
Written on: 10/06/2013
Very good and comprehensive review. Swapped my heavy and bulky XVS1100 Dragstar for a VT750S after reading this and am more than pleased. Much easier to handle at low speeds with my wife on the pillion. Did have to buy a gel seat external pad however as a recent 200 mile round tip resulted in lots of complaints from my wife. I am getting on a bit and find this bike ideal for me.
Written on: 06/06/2013
Best review I have ever read, interesting, informative and realistic!!! Great job!!
Written on: 06/06/2013
Thanks to all of you who have left a comment, genuinely appreciated. A lovely bike, much missed but I've now moved to he UAE and had to sell it (she's gone to a good home and the new owner seems very happy).
Written on: 16/04/2013
Fantastic review..having just come of my sports bike breaking my ankle I promised the wife I would look for a cruiser a little more manageable for a more mature rider..lol I am looking for something a little more sedate for my ride without compromising the smile on the face ... I love the look of this bike and it seems to fit well with me. After reading this I am convinced its the next ride for me...Thanks!
Written on: 03/10/2012
My goodness, what an interesting review! I agree, the best I have read. Detailed, unbiased, with the added advantage of excellent previous riding or at least bike ownership experience.
written by on 12/08/2010
I have had motorbikes for years but last year decided to call it a day. Was in the Honda dealer 4 weeks ago and saw the bike and weakendand bought it. Haven't stopped smiling since. Love it.
written by on 20/10/2009
i bought my vt750c in march this year, the only downside of the bike for me is that it is down on horsepower, other than that i enjoy the bike, the riding position is spot on for me, and pillion according to the missus is comfortable, we did 1,600 miles in a week this year in irealand and it was comfortable for both of us.
written by Terri Ann on 27/06/2009
The Honda VT750 Shadow is a beautiful machine
written by tablet27 on 25/05/2009
Bought a new Honda VT750X 2009 shaft drive. Having had a number of Yamaha Viragos I thought i would try the New Honda. Good on most points. Handling very good, acceleration good comfortable riding position.
Very disappointed that having a puncture after 742 miles to find out that you cannot take off the rear wheel without removing the Exhaust pipes / foot pegs etc.and then raising the bike 900 mm off the floor to remove the wheel from below the mudguard. This makes a normal bike puncture a 20 minute job but a Honda VT750C a 3 hour epic.
The mirrors are too short and 50% of the view is blocked by the ride. It is not possible to reposition as the mirror is part of the Break fluid unit.
written by on 30/04/2009
Bought my Honda VT750 Shadow used in 2004 with 13,000 miles on it. I now have over 40,000 miles and my only maintenance has been tires, chains, front brake pads, oil changes, and one tune-up. It's a great bike. Extremely nimble for a cruiser. Rides low, is very balanced, and has a great feel. It won't win any drag races, but it has enough power for me and gets between 50-55 mpg in the city. I bought it with a Mustang seat, Memphis Shades windshield, and some leather saddle bags and I added Vans and Hines Cruiser pipes.
Great bike!
written by MountainMan on 13/03/2009
*****
REVIEW UPDATE
Well here we are March 12, 2009 and the VT750 Honda Shadow is still running as good as ever! I wrote my first review after owning the Shadow Aero for just one year, now its 4 years old going on to 5 year very soon, and I have clocked onto the Shadow some 60,000 Km's. ( about 38,000 miles ).
REPAIRS TO DATE: None really only a new set of tires one set of front brake pads tune ups 3 sets of head light bulbs .valve adjustments spark plugs new air filter oil and lube and filters all the normal stuff you have to do. Break downs or any other problems ZERO!
If you think this bike is some city use bike, your dead wrong! Have been to Alberta and back 3 times on it, up north not to far away from crossing over into the north west territories and Yukon and so on. Have taken this street bike off roading and just like as if it was a dirty bike a very big and heavy dirty bike mind you. However it handled it very well and even went to the top of a mountain, to a lake where a number of dirt bikers were up there to watch them picking there jaws up out of the dirt as I pulled in with the shadow. One of them even commented to me what you make it all the way up here on .that..? PLEASE keep in mind that I have 30+ years of riding experience under my belt, and know my limits as well as the bike and what I can expect it to do and will NOT do! Don't push you limits ( AKA you luck ) it could turn around and bite you big time!
The Honda Shadow Aero has a low C of G ( center of gravity ) that makes this bike a joy to ride and is very forgiving of mistakes that would dump most any other bike right on its side in very short order. This makes it a very good bike for someone that does not have all that much riding experience. It is by NO means a bike for beginner ! Make no mistake about that! It is however a good bike for someone that wants to get into a bigger bike and would like to take some long haul trips.
I have found from my experience with the VT750 Shadow Aero that the best all around performance in the way of comfort and handling as well as getting the most Km's to a tank of gas all happens at a speeds ranging from 70 to 100 Km/h ( about 40 to 60 MPH ).
Best mileage per tank seems to take place at between 80 to 100 Km/H ( 50~60 MPH ).
Oil I use AMSOIL 10W40, but if I am going in land and know that I will be riding a lot in high temps of 28C and up, then I tend to favor Amsoil 20W50. With this oil I have found the gear box shifts smoother and the clutch likes it, making it smooth without grabbing as it does with other oils I have tried. Next best to Amsoil I would have to say is Chevron DELO 15W40. This oil is good in that it has higher levels of detergents then standard oils. This helps clean the engine, and keep it clean inside more so then other oils. Amsoil also seems to have higher levels of detergents then everyday run of the mill oils, not all the sure on that. But the engine seems to love the Amsoil the best and stays clean longer, not the oil but the engine inside stays cleaner.
P.S. Future plans with luck this year. Is to replace the VT750 with the Honda GoldWing GL1800. I am finding that my riding is now going more into serious long haul touring, and after taking a test ride on a GL1800 GoldWing well I did not want to take it back to the dealership. You could say I am just a little impressed and know what my next move will be. What is going to become of my VT750 ? Not sure might keep it as a fun bike for easy riding and for bombing around on in the city or shorter trips and so on. The truth is I will have a very hard time giving up my shadow as I have spent much time on it, and gone to many places and I have very fond memories with it and I can not seem to bring myself to getting rid of it. But if I do get rid of it it will be to someone that will look after it and care for it as I have. It still looks like new it looks like it just rolled off the show room floor to this very day, and ride like it too!
P.S.S When I get the GoldWing of my dreams I will do a write up on it as well once I get to know it some like in 10,000Km's or so which should be in like 6 months or so LOL.
written by freddyyoung on 03/02/2009
The Honda VT750 Shadow is a comfortable, low ride height for us shorties. Had a Honda VT750C for about a year and a half now, find it a great bike to ride, easy to handle and just about enough power to get you out of trouble when you need to, ideal for shorter riders like me. Not many bad points really, only the turning circle is about twice as wide as the M25, Honda accesories are really really expensive.
written by on 28/11/2008
Great Bike for the money. You just can't go wrong here. As always with Honda. They really think things out before their products hit the market, and it shows here. With just an exhaust, carb jetting, and air filter change this bike will hold it's own or just plan spanks some other 900 to 1000 cc bikes. The bike will run at 70 mph all day with out a whimper. It's a worry free ride. If it has gas and oil. It will get you from point A to point B with out a problem. I've been riding for nearly 30 years. I rode a lot of bikes before I bought this. And as a matter of fact I wasn't even looking at the VT 750. I test rode it the same day I test rode a VTX 1300. Just because it was there, and the dealer was having a problem wit the VTX not wanting to stay running. After just a short run across town about 4 miles, and all the other bikes I test rode. Something kept bringing me back to this bike. Right out of the box it had a lot of manners on the street, and for a 750 power to spare. Not stupid power, but power. It just felt like I was riding an old friend right from the start. I would say. Put it out of your mind that it is only a 750, and at least ride one. This is not a bike to be judged by its spec sheet.
written by on 17/09/2008
Look are very appealing, probably all the chrome appoiments, overal 43 to 52 miles a gallon, believe it handles fairly well. Disappointed in Honda parts pump, gas. Took a month for Honda to come up with a new one. They are very expensive and overated, I'm more inclined to do what service I can do myself. Summation, I'd say, find more reasonable parts, it is a shame it would take Honda a month or any bike, parts, especially I mean Honda to place a electrical, gas pump on back order for a month, this past summer of 08. I do like the 02 Honda vt750ace, black. I think the saddle could have been much better. Honda in my opinion has them over rated, well overpriced on parts and service. I do like the design of this bike, hope you ' re listening to this, Honda.
written by canadad on 17/08/2008
My first bike and I love it. Accessorizes well. Lots of options available. Replaced horrible stock seat with a Mustang custom seat with drivers back rest. Unbelievable ride now. It actually looks better than the stock seat too. This is a great bike that keeps up with large cruisers.
written by COLORADOBIKERS on 18/04/2008
Give a good range of ride comfortable and very reliable engine no problem at all.
written by on 17/12/2007
Overall the VT 750 is a good first Bike for those who like the concept cruiser without paying the high that other some type cruisers cost.
Written on: 07/08/2008
Bought a 2007 VT750C about 6 months ago, incredible value for a cruiser, makes those American things look very expensive. Very economical, about 50mpg if you ride it sensibly, but whose gonna do that! My only 2 criticisms so far are, fast idle and noisy gear change especially from 1st to 2nd which is inherant with the Shadow, otherwise very happy.
written by NZDale on 23/01/2007
The Honda VT750 Shadow is an awesome bike. See above for more details.
written by mattywiz on 25/03/2006
I own a VT750 Shadow 2006, my first bike aside from fourwheelers and such. I must say that the low bars made it complicated to learn with, and it makes it a little more difficult to go into a turn. However, this is a great bike all around. I have averaged about 62miles to the gallon and it seems to be a pretty solid piece of equipment. I would definitly recommend this bike to a friend, first time buyer, even an experienced rider.
written by ranga41 on 13/07/2004
I am 5'10" 185lbs and this Honda VT750 Shadow Cruiser bike is perfect. If you want a beginner bike to cruise at 70-80 mph effortlessly this is the one and the seat is very comfortable. I maxed this bike i guess at 100mph (the speedo needle stops at 95mph) was still pretty comfortable (no wind shield). Initially i felt the bike was shaky in wind but after putting 3000miles in under 3 months, I dont feel it anymore (probably got used to it). The only complaint I have is that I have rubbed the foot rest to the ground in sharp turn at least a dozen times (this may be because i try to tilt it to look cool when it is really not required). Most people dont recongnise this is a 750cc bike, it looks similar to Honda,s 1100cc cruiser.
The fuel reserve once gave up at just 25 miles (suppose to be atleast 40miles)..lucky for me i was near a gas station...
Once we've checked over your question we will put it live on the site and our strong community of experts will hopefully give you some great answers that you find useful.
We will email you when the question is on the site
Once we've checked over your answer we will put it live on the site so others can gain from your experience. We rely on members like you to sustain our vibrant community so thanks again, we couldn't do it without you.
We will email your when your answer is on the site
Once we've checked over your answer we will put it live on the site so others can gain from your experience. We rely on members like you to sustain our vibrant community so thanks again, we couldn't do it without you.
We will email your when your answer is on the site
As rated by our community of reviewers
Guest's Response to gazza883's Review
Written on: 13/09/2011
Best car or motorbike review I've ever read; comprehensive, informative and witty - well done.