Pace Twin DTV recorder Reviews

Click here if this is your business
Pace Twin DTV recorder
★★★☆☆
2.6
43.0% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Features

  • Ease of Use

  • Value For Money

? Ask our helpful community of experts about this product or company
Pace Twin DTV recorder - Ask a question now

Media Gallery for Pace Twin DTV recorder

Refine your search

  • Average Rating Over Time
  • Within the last month ***** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 6 months *** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 12 months * (From 0 reviews)

Latest Reviews

“Good product. My 770D has run well for the 6 months or...”

★★★★☆

written by Bretzky on 09/11/2008

Good product. My 770D has run well for the 6 months or so that Ive owned it, this is not to say that it ran glitch free but it's overall preformance was good. Sometimes it freezes (like other chip based toys) and you simply reboot. I've had the wrong times recorded and the wrong shows but I'm sure in at least a few cases it was the TV programming and not the PVR.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“I have had a Pace TDC770D for two weeks. It sometimes...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by Saxon2 on 08/10/2008

I have had a Pace TDC770D for two weeks. It sometimes freezes the picture; while watching the Obama/McCain debate tonight, I had to leave my large flat screen HDTV and go to my small 21 inch in my bedroom because the picture froze. Often when I program it for future recording, I return to find that it has recorded at the appropriate time, but not the channel selected; sometimes if I set it to record a show that runs 5:00 to 5:30, I would find that it has recorded from 5:00 to 5:00. Today I programmed it to record a show on CBS from 4:00 to 5:00, and it recorded the program from 5r:00 to 6:00. A technician from the cable company where I bought it is coming to look at it tomorrow; I hope this can be resolved soon, because after splurging on HDTV, I expect better performance all around than I had before.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“Even though, according to the machine, it is receiving...”

★★★☆☆

written by PeterRD on 01/06/2007

Even though, according to the machine, it is receiving a good signal strength, the picture still breaks up occasionally. I recently bought a Toshiba flat screen digital TV and the picture has not broken up so far.

My Pace Twin DTV Recorder used to crash occasionally, but I found by replacing all the cheap hook up coax leads with high quality double screened leads, it has not crashed since. I think the unit is sensitive to room thermostats, etc.

Having bought my sister a Humax PVR for Christmas, I wish I had a Humax as well, much quicker in use and more features for less money.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“Have had the Pace Twin DTV Recorder for just over two...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by Niguel on 30/10/2006

Have had the Pace Twin DTV Recorder for just over two and a half years and it's been nothing but a problem! Often does not record programmes when set up to do so, also ITV frequently has no sound. The electronic program guide is useless as it is mainly empty when you go into it and frequently takes ten minutes or more to load up! Often drops channels as if there is poor reception yet my Sony IDTV picks them up fine! To cap it all one of the digits on the front display/clock has now gone out which means you cant tell what channel your on unless you hit the remote.
Incidentally my parents have the same model and have exactly the same problems bar the digit failure on the display! Would never buy a PACE product again...

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“I bought my Twin directly from Pace just over a year...”

★★★★★

written by Duncan Mann on 01/11/2005

I bought my Twin directly from Pace just over a year ago. I paid £175 then, and it would seem that it is available at around £150 now. It seems to me that this is good value, though the first thing I did on receiving the unit was to trash to puny 20Gb hard disk and replace it with a 80Gb unit, thus increasing the unit's ability to store video from 10 to 40 hours. Provided i) you don't mind taking a risk with the warranty and ii) are comfortable with the idea of delving into the innards of the machine, this is pretty much of a must-do. Actually the upgrade process is easy enough, and well documented on the web, just remember to factor in the cost of a replacement notebook hard drive, which are currently available in capacities of up to 100Gb. An 80Gb drive from Dabs currently costs around £70.

The unit was shipped with software that was already a year old. Sadly, it can only be upgraded by means of over-the-air transmissions, and these are few and far between. Since buying my Twin in October 2004, Pace have broadcast software upgrades in January and October 2005. Murphy's law dictated that I was away on holiday in January, so missed that one, and have only just therefore received a software upgrade (version 1.7.70) that brings me up to date with all Pace's development work over the last two years!

This upgrade has totally transformed the unit. Whereas previously the EPG was monumentally slow and frustrating, it is now very swift to load, and with many more navigational features. It is much easier to set up recordings than previously. In addition, the Twin seems much more responsive all round. The interface is now a great pleasure to use. Indeed, my sister has a Pansonic PVR/DVD combo which has a truly horrible interface by comparison.

The Twin has always excelled at providing high quality pictures, and I really think that Pace have missed a trick here - with its current software, this unit really is a terrific buy. So why did it take Pace so long to get it right?

In its previous form, I would have cautiously recommended the Pace Twin, with the proviso that users should expect some strengths and some weaknesses. Pace now seem to have fixed most of the weaknesses, so I would unreservedly recommend the unit with the new software.

Given the fact that the Twin was originally released in 2002, I'm sure that it must now have a limited life span before replacement I can only hope that Pace make it much easier to upgrade the software in future products (or release over-the-air software upgrades much more frequently), and work hard to get the software right first time!

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Misamson's Response to Duncan Mann's Review

Written on: 22/04/2009

THANKS FOR YOUR INFO WILL BE VERY HELPFULL IF U CAN PLEASE TELL US WHAT KIND OF HARD DRIVE DID U USE AND HOW DID U UPGRADE.
<br/>
<br/>THANK-U
<br/>MARK
<br/>
<br/>

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Misamson's Response to Duncan Mann's Review

Written on: 22/04/2009

I found this review helpful because... I WOULD LIKE TO UPGRADE AS WELL

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 0

“If the Pace Twin DTV recorder worked it would be...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by MikeTheBike on 21/09/2005

If the Pace Twin DTV recorder worked it would be wonderful. Unfortunately, I can guarantee that if I go on holiday and set it to record one weeks programmes that at some point in the week it will crash and all further recordings will be lost. This is a known issue that has not been fixed.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“I have had my Pace box now for around a month and find...”

★★★★☆

written by DannyM on 07/06/2005

I have had my Pace box now for around a month and find it to be excellent quality. The picture is better than my Sky box.
With the twin tuners I can record a program for the wife and still watch the England match without any complaints!
The 7 day EPG is slow compared to the SKY version because it downloads it at a slow speed, but you do get use to it. I still can't get use to the pause feature as it seems weird to pause the TV to answer the front door etc ...
I have had a couple of blips with the Hard disk playing back the video recording but only two since I have had the box. Pace assure me that a New software download will be available in July to cure this.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“As seems to be common policy these days, Pace clearly...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by crankboy on 19/05/2005

As seems to be common policy these days, Pace clearly rushed these units out before a complete or even moderate testing program!

The initial level of bugs (crashes/lock-ups) completely cancelled out any possible intial pleasure of owning one of these machines.
From that point and after a few firmware downloads (that have long since dried up) the unit settled down into more infrequent but no less stressful unreliability.
I still never know whether an un-supervised recording is going to just completely fill the hard-drive and then show as "nothing recorded."
That's the unit's absolute favourite trick.

Just today in fact the unit now crashes every time Channel 4 is selected!
Hence the inspiration to finally write a review.

Unfortunately, for those wanting to escape video tape when I bought this unit there was little alternative, and it certainly wasn't the cheapest option!
Considering the general reliability of almost all consumer electronics (even the cheapest stuff) I would say that the Pace Twin is the worst unit I have ever bought.
I will avoid buying anything else from the "Pace" brand at any cost.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“Power down at least once a week. PACE customer support...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by AH on 09/05/2005

Power down at least once a week. PACE customer support leaves a lot to be desired. 2 years and still no fix to the problem.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“Had my Pace Twin DTV recorder for a year now and for...”

★★★★☆

written by Mting on 02/02/2005

Had my Pace Twin DTV recorder for a year now and for the few faults mine has shown, I still wouldn't be without it. I have read reports by others who seem to have suffered a great deal more than I have. Mine will fully lock up very occasionally requiring a power down and sometimes on playback the picture will freeze for a second and thenb accelerate back to where it should be again. Some software versions seem to be worse than others. The unit seems to be sensitive to temperature and this occurs more if the unit gets hot. I had a look inside recently whilst fitting an 80GB disk (43 hours of space - yippee!) and there is no internal fan so no surprises there then. Playback picture quality is indistinguishable from the original broadcast.
If Pace had finished the software to eliminate the few faults, they could have had a world beater. The user interface is superb, even my mother could understand it!

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Pjh's Response to 183024_Mting's Review

Written on: 17/05/2005

I can concur with the previous review entirely. The user interface is second to none. Miles better than Sky Plus. I have a pal nearby who has a Pace Puma too. He's had much more trouble than me but gets a stronger signal. He had a tv signal amplifier installed and coax run round his house. Apart from the potential for rf interference from the amplifier, I can't help wondering if the miles of cheap poorly screened coax is contributing to his problems.
<br>I've had various Freeview boxes and have experienced less than acceptable performance from all of them. Things improved a lot when I re-terminated every aerial connection in my system.
<br>It seems as though the technology has some way to go before we get the 100% reliability we have grown used to from other cheap tecnology of modern times!

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Pjh's Response to 183024_Mting's Review

Written on: 24/02/2006

After my Pace Twins hung two weeks ago, I powered it off and on. I was at the point of getting on to pace to try and get some sort of compensation for this unreliable product when I got a message saying there was a software upgrade being broadcast. I went ahead cynically with this update and some two weeks on, and to my amazement, the damn thing is behaving itself at last! I had been sending Pace some choice communications since the previous upgrade which was sometime late last year. Perhaps sufficient numbers of complaints jolted them into action, who knows! It's a shame the customer has to increasingly play "Guineapig" for manufacturers, and they can't get a product sorted before they bring it to market!!

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Jackass's Response to 183024_Mting's Review

Written on: 14/08/2005

The reviewer is correct. The audio track on playback is constant but the picture stalls and then sprints to catch up. This is a real pain if you are transfering to, say, DVD for archiving.
<br>I have contacted Pace several times regarding the update of software and they keep saying it is in the pipeline.
<br>Other than that - it's tumbleweed and the sound of distant bells.
<br>I have stopped holding my breath.
<br>Other than that the unit is OK and the interface is spot on - the wife even manages to set the timer record on occcasion.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“Have had a Pace Twin DTV recorder for just over a...”

★★★☆☆

written by Aspects on 27/12/2004

Have had a Pace Twin DTV recorder for just over a month, initially impressed, no longer so. Pace was an upgrade from Ferguson unit which gave little trouble, occasional lock up. Pace unit has numerous picture freezes (also partial pixalation) on live broadcasts (four or five have occured in half hour programme), has locked up on a couple of occasions and failed to record programmes. Agree with much of what Skysurfer reviewer has said. Prior to reading these reviews I contacted Pace re. the problems and they said they were unaware of picture freezes on live transmission. Recently down loaded latest software, no change. Aerial strength approx. 84%.
Have had good picture quality both in live and recorded broadcasts when workin OK, unfortunately picture freezes occur too often which put a complete damper on the product.
Am about to return it to supplier for replacement/refund.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 0

“I think that the Pace Twin DTV recorder is a much...”

★★★★★

written by hmattos on 12/09/2004

I think that the Pace Twin DTV recorder is a much under rated and ignored product. If promoted a good deal this product should sell millions. Every friend I speak to is amazed by how easy it is to use and all the useful functions it has. Even the children can happily use and record programmes on it without worrying about tape length or deleting some crucial programme.
All in all a great product.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“The good and bad points say most of what there is to say. ”

★★☆☆☆

written by skysurfer on 03/03/2004

The good and bad points say most of what there is to say.
I think this Pace Twin DTV recorder is not fit for sale as a video recorder. Over the last 11 months we have been used as testers for the various versions of software. After 3 months I sent it back to Pace for a replacement, but that's the same.
I would at least expect the basic functionality of being able to view a timer recording to be reliable and it is not! (Therefore zero star rating as a video recorder).
The software has not changed for 4 months now although they promised new software for December, so I guess they have abandoned it as it is.
The concept is good. If you want to play with the cutting edge of digital viewing/recording then go ahead and buy one. (Therefore 4 stars as an interesting toy!) If anyone in your household is going to get upset by frequently missing their TV programs then avoid this product!

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Elchenuk's Response to skysurfer's Review

Written on: 12/03/2004

Don\'t agree with this review. I have had excellent experience with my Pace. A lot of the negative points are very minor, and as far as the HDD goes I\'ve replaced mine with an 80 Gig version.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Skysurfer's Response to skysurfer's Review

Written on: 23/01/2006

I have put up with this machine for nearly 3 years now! Since the long awaited software update at the end of 2005 it has been more reliable.
<br>
<br>The setting of recording timers from the 7-day guide is simple and better thought out than any of the current machines I've seen. (A shame there's no picture/sound while in the program guide).
<br>The fast forward/reverse in playback is now almost faultless.
<br>Failed recordings are far less common. (1 failed in 2 weeks rather than 1 failed in 2 days).
<br>
<br>It's much better than it was but still frustrating on the occasions when recordings do fail... Rather old technology now compared with recorders that can record 2 channels at once and have 8 times the recording capacity like the Topfield 5800 or the Humax 9200.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Jimmyoung's Response to skysurfer's Review

Written on: 05/02/2005

elchenuk - would you mind spilling the beans about upgrading the HDD on the pace twin DTVR? Did you simply copy all files from the old to the new to ensure the software was retained (or does that reside on a flash chip on the board?). Did you need a certain spec HDD or just a standard notebook-size or regular 3.5" drive? Cheers for the info.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Zanniehome's Response to skysurfer's Review

Written on: 06/12/2004

I totally agree with the negative comments, I have had my recorder about a year.
<br>When I first bought it I was over the moon and recommended all my friends to buy one.
<br>But now I find that it generally works well but locks up, loses programmes etc just as the man said. I recorded Terminator 3 a couple of weeks ago went to watch it and after 39 mins it totally seized very frustrating.
<br>Someone told me that Digital stuff gets clogged up in the same way as computer hard discs and that this is what causes the problems. I do not know if this is true but it is very frustrating not to be certain of recording programes that I want to see.
<br> I too have been keeping up to date with all the new software.
<br>The recording time is also limited to 10 hours TV although virtually unlimited Radio and I find virtually unlimited Radio 4 and Radio 7 recording is a vast improvement from the previous cassette and timer limitations.
<br>I went away for easter leaving a full programme and when I came back nothing had been recorded. This has happened several times I think that I probably lose about one programme ever two weeks this way so I would not consider the system reliable.
<br>However it is quite userfriendly to programme if cumbersome.
<br>
<br>I am thinking of getting a DVD recorder (which is how I found this site) and using the pace recorder just for Radio

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Webgirl's Response to skysurfer's Review

Written on: 07/11/2004

Completely agree with this review!
<br>
<br>PACE have even admitted the issues that are raised as pointed out to them in numerous, very long emails. They state a new software upgrade is due November 2004 and "should" fix the problems. Currently trying to reset the second box - I too took the original one back to no benefit - to original factory settings to see if that helps.
<br>
<br>I'm sticking to my SVHS recorder...!!!

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Johnmarsh's Response to skysurfer's Review

Written on: 08/04/2004

I bought a used Pace Twin and I have not found any faults yet. I reset it to the factory specs, hooked up my VCR/DVD combo, and it all works!
<br>
<br>I updated software about a week ago, and I have had no freezes, drop-outs, blank screens, etc.
<br>
<br>My signal strength is about 60% and I will upgrade my aerial soon, but it is really great!

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 4 2

“The Pace Twin DTV recorder has changed my life! Well,...”

★★★★★

written by heckbulb on 14/02/2004

The Pace Twin DTV recorder has changed my life! Well, my TV viewing habbits anyway. It lets you record up to 10 hrs of broadcast quality digital tlevision or radio, pause live TV and is so easy to use - just select the program to rec from the EPG and hit REC. You can still set up manual timed recordings of course. You can also start to watch a program before it finishes recording. Or you can plug in a second TV and you effectivly have two digital TV tuners.

The bad point is that it does ocationally crash/freeze, and the picture can sometimes skip a frame - but that could be my tv reception quality. Pace do plan to broadcast an over the air software update to fix such bugs though.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 4 0

Do you have a question about this product or company? Simply type it in the box below and one of our community will give you an answer

Our helpful community of likeminded people will be happy to answer any questions that you have.

Thanks for asking a question.

Once we've checked over your question we will put it live on the site and our strong community of experts will hopefully give you some great answers that you find useful.

We will email you when the question is on the site

overview