Beko 32WLA520HD Reviews

Click here if this is your business
★★★☆☆
3 / 5
50% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Image Quality

  • Sound Quality

  • Features

  • Value For Money

? Ask our helpful community of experts about this product or company
Beko 32WLA520HD - Ask a question now

Refine your search

Use the tools below to refine your search by only displaying reviews with a certain number of star ratings or to only show reviews from a certain time period. Eg click on '1 star' to just display the reviews we have which received a 1 star rating click or 'Within the last month' to display just reviews posted over the last month.

  • Average Rating Over Time
  • Within the last month ***** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 6 months *** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 12 months * (From 0 reviews)

Latest Reviews

★☆☆☆☆

“Poor picture quality, bad sound quality, only 1 x...”

Written on: 18/12/2009 by TimMead70 (1 review written)

Poor picture quality, bad sound quality, only 1 x HDMI, un-user friendly… Read Full Review

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review
Was this review helpful? 0 0
★★★★★

“Beko 32WLA520HD - Television Picture QualityHigh...”

Written on: 16/09/2009 by jasonx1 (107 reviews written)

Beko 32WLA520HD - Television Picture QualityHigh Definition Ready.32in (82cm) TV with 82cm visible screen size.Resolution 1366 x 768 pixels.Brightness 500cd/m2.Contrast ratio 800:1.Viewing angle 176/176 degrees.Progressive scan.ConnectivityHDMI socket.2 SCART sockets.VGA socket.Component video socket.Composite socket.Coaxial optical connection.Headphone socket.S-video socket.Back AV socket.Sound QualityNicam stereo sound.2 x 10w RMS power output.Additional FeaturesTeletext.Fastext.UHF and VHF… Read Full Review

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review
Was this review helpful? 0 0
overview