Olympus 70-300mm 1:4.0-5.6 ED Lens Reviews

Click here if this is your business
★★★★☆
3.5
67.0% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Sharpness

  • Value For Money

? Ask our helpful community of experts about this product or company
Olympus 70-300mm 1:4.0-5.6 ED Lens - Ask a question now

Refine your search

  • Average Rating Over Time
  • Within the last month ***** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 6 months *** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 12 months * (From 0 reviews)

Latest Reviews

“Excellent value if you work with its restrictions....”

★★★★☆

written by alanscape on 24/03/2013

As this is the only choice for a 70-300mm in Olympus 4/3rds I decided to buy one. It compares favourably with my 50-200mm up to 200mm if you stick to f/8 or f/11 (if edge definition matters to your subjects). Like all consumer grade lenses it doesn't come without restrictions but as with any tele-zoom, it's not good to use it full out or wide open. It's a well made lens and perhaps a disadvantage for polariser users is the front element rotates.. but I never use one so it doesn't matter to me. It's also nice and light... I have one on my OM-D and it's a treat weight-wise from my 90-250mm (which is also quite expensive at £4,700). For pixel-peepers it won't be a satisfying lens but if your target printed size doesn't exceed a double page magazine, then it's a very good buy... like everything else... you have to know how to use it. This is my personal experience using this lens... being a professional, my equipment has to do what it was designed for otherwise I wouldn't buy it. I was not disappointed.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“Slow, slow, slow, slow, slow, about sums it up. Oh,...”

★★☆☆☆

written by simples on 07/03/2010

Slow, slow, slow, slow, slow, about sums it up. Oh, and soft. I'll let others more knowledgeable give the technical details, but these are my thoughts having used this lens for two weeks photographing birds in my garden.

It's also way too heavy for my little Olympus E-410, causing the camera body to flex unless you keep a good grip on the lens itself at all times. £300 isn't a fortune, especially by Olympus lens standards, but there must be a whole lot better than this - sorry I don't know where, but this lens is appalling.

Autofocus is next to useless unless shooting a still object in bright sunlight, which is maybe why they handily put the manual over-ride switch on the barrel. Same goes for sharpness - lack of light seriously affects this lens. Unless you want to photograph snails in the desert, don't waste your money on this as a wildlife lens. The much cheaper and shorter 40-150 outperforms this lens in every respect, and even if the lack of length means cropping the picture by 3/4 you still end up with a sharper image.

I can see no practical use for this lens - save up for the 200 or 400mm if wildlife is your thing, or stick with the basic kit lens 40-150 f/3.5-4.5.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“I got this lens with my Olympus E-520 kit and I'm very...”

★★★★★

written by BobTech on 26/11/2008

I got this lens with my Olympus E-520 kit and I'm very happy with it. Not only is it a great telephoto zoom lens for distant subjects, but it's just as useful as a macro lens. In manual focus mode, it can focus down to 960mm (from subject to camera's focal plane), making it possible to get excellent photos of insects etc while still being far enough away to not scare the subject. Of course it helps a lot to use a tripod and a camera with an image stabiliser because camera shake can blur the photos, which applies to all lenses of this kind. I certainly recommend this lens!

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Bobtech's Response to BobTech's Review

Written on: 29/11/2008

I just noticed that this review is supposed to be for a 70-300mm 35mm *film* lens. Can you even buy such a thing now?<br/>The review I did is for the 4/3 format *digital* lens with exactly those specifications.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Bobtech's Response to BobTech's Review

Written on: 03/12/2008

The lens I own and wrote a review of is a specifically *digital* lens for the Four Thirds format used by Olympus, Leica and Panasonic. It is *not* a 35mm film format lens as described by Review Centre.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

Do you have a question about this product or company? Simply type it in the box below and one of our community will give you an answer

Our helpful community of likeminded people will be happy to answer any questions that you have.

Thanks for asking a question.

Once we've checked over your question we will put it live on the site and our strong community of experts will hopefully give you some great answers that you find useful.

We will email you when the question is on the site

overview