This newspaper doesn't contain most of important news. Some news are like created story.

This is a hypocritical nasty little paper that will say anything to sell itself. It's got a long history of supporting anti British ideas including Hitler and the Mosley black shirts. It continues in this vein to this day vilifying just about everything and everyone that it thinks are easy targets. It panders to just about every right wing hate campaign as if it was talking for the British people. It doesn't. Fortunately it's view of what is British and what Britain stands for is very far from the truth. If I could give it a review of 0 then I would.

The Daily Mail has interesting human interest articles and is ok to read as a newspaper. Unfortunately, the online version is read and commented on by racists, haters and rightwing nuts galore. The headlines are deliberately written to provoke rightwing crazies to write comments. Most of the comments are judgmental, reactionary, nasty and ignorant. It is a shame the DM decided to cater to the worst of society. If they were more discriminating in the headlines and comments, it wouldn't be so revolting.

The Daily Mail appears to enjoy nothing more than attempting to whip up vitriol and bile amongst its 'readership' against various elements of our society; their targets are many, but here's a few examples... they despise anyone claiming benefits (all workshy scroungers, according to the DM), Erwp (Europe) and the EU, and anyone working in the public sector (feckless, workshy pen-pushers with platinum-plated pensions, again according to the DM). Articles are usually completely one-sided, and any inconvenient facts are ignored in pursuit of their own right-wing agenda (I'm not even sure which political party they endorse, as they enjoy bashing the Tories too). There's plenty of the usual celebrity non-story nonsense, and the DM take a great delight in pointing out any such celebrities who may, God forbid, be a little overweight/ underweight. Unfortunately, I understand that this hateful excuse for journalism has a large readership, which is actually even more depressing than having the misfortune to read this drivel of a newspaper in the first place.

lets be honest about this. the content of the newspaper is close to zero. its biased, unhelpful, provocative journalism. the main reason to be on this site, is the comments section. its subjects on a loop. the royals/army/cancer/left-right wing/benefits/immigrants/'great britain'/gp's/councils. their obvious agenda is to whip up annoyance and provoke a reaction. I guess they've succeeded in their mission - i've said 'yes' to recommending it. thats only because..well...if people dont visit, the comments wont exist. The annoying thing is, is the censorship. all comments are moderated, whether the article says moderated or not. If what you comment doesnt agree with their agenda, it wont be printed. If your comment is to provoke a reaction from a group of people, its likely to be printed. Many articles are printed with "moderated" advertised, so you are unable to comment on what they are saying. This 'news'papers intention is clearly to annoy the readers, to give people something to 'complain' about. "did you see that article in the DM? oh dear oh dear. 'this country'." etc. Clearly run by a person who wants to annoy. ;)

As the journalists filed past, Carlos Tevez probably didn't pick the wisest moment to be sharing a joke with Pablo Zabaleta, tipping back his head with laughter, animated, seemingly without a care in the world

The Daily Mail is a newspaper which brings a mixture of news, opinion, finance, health and sport with a somewhat conservative bias. The Mail's weakness is that if anything, despite the fact it runs up a fair few pages, there is not always a great deal of news in it or the analysis is sometimes a touch too superficial.

It does summarise political affairs succinctly and some editorial opinions are stylishly put together (Max Hastings and Melanie Phillips usually write interesting and often thought-provoking opinion pieces), but whether you agree with the content is entirely up to you. I usually find myself agreeing with some aspects but not others.

If you are very left-leaning though, you'll hate it regardless.

Cancer in newspaper form. Full of hate and a strong rightwing bias.

The Daily Mail cannot be defined a "newspaper": there are no news in it. Most of the paper is made up by pseudo-informative and pseudo-scientific articles that play on the fears and expectations of the readers: focus on facts and evidence is null. This is particularly serious giving the number of features devoted to health. It would not recommend it to anybody.