NAD C352 Review

Click here if this is your business
★★★★☆
4.4 / 5
From 4 reviews
100% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Sound Quality

  • Features

  • Value For Money

mrdom87's review of NAD C352

★★★★☆

“I really like the C352 and I will be keeping it for...”

Written on: 14/05/2007 by mrdom87 (2 reviews written)

Good Points
Great for the money, more powerful than the stats would suggest, pre-amp outputs for bi-amping,

Bad Points
The casework on this amp is a little poor when compared to some lower priced amps that use aluminium where the NAD uses plastic, but then the NAD has much better internal components, which more than evens it out for me because you know where the money is going.
Also the remote, although very useful, is also very large and extremely ugly.

General Comments
I really like the C352 and I will be keeping it for some time ever though I wont use it in my main system, I also have a NAD c272 and a musical fidelity pre-amp which it compares relatively well to with more efficient speakers, though with anything under about 90db/watt its a little underpowered I find, fine if you don't intend to push it too hard though, the 272 and presumably 372 though have endless power, the sound can be improved with using a high quality interconnect between the pre and power sections, but try a few maybe as you might not always find the difference an improvement. and preferably use something of 0.5m or less or it makes it more or less pointless.

  • Value For Money

  • Sound Quality

  • Features

  • Over 1 Year

    Time Amplifier Owned

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Beemer's Response to mrdom87's Review

Written on: 16/08/2007

I agree with this review because I own a C352.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review
Was this review helpful? 0 0