Marantz CD63 KI signature
Features
Sound Quality
Value For Money
Marantz CD63 KI signature
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Here's how it works.
User Reviews
Sound Quality
Features
Value For Money
Marantz Cd63 Kis
this is a truely terrible player,completely over hyped no idea why,i owned one and stopped listening to music along with the awful kis pm 66 amplifier i listened to this against a marantz cd6300 and that is a good player,maybe technology has moved on a lot the cd6300 is fine good id say but this 63 is the pits,i like the linn players genki and ikemi good second hand now
The CD63mkII, CD63SE and CD63KI to me were the first players to produce true depth in the soundstage. The sound became 3D when using a very good pair of headphones. I remember having compared those to players twice as expensive and these were just better in that regard (depth), and to me were very musical players, really making fun listening to good recordings.
I must say that I'm more inclined to agree with guest's opinion (if I understand it). It sounds like he's quite sure that he can hear a difference with the amp/speakers he's got.
"Product of the Year", "hifi journalists"!! I'd not take too much notice of that. I once hung on every word that the 'experts' said, even if they did contradict each other, and even themselves. But those days are over.
The 63 KI is a moderately good player (among many), but nothing more.
I agree. I think CD63KI (and even 63SE) can compete with later models CD17 and 17mk2. These Players almost sound analogue to me. I am still using one of those!
With your opinion you stand pretty much alone. Do yourself a favour and buy a really good amplifier and fine speakers. The weak point in your system may be the cheap integrated amp. Go for a better model or upgrade straight to a pre/power amp combo. This CD player was elected "Product of the Year" by dozens of European hifi journalists - not without a reason. If it sounds terrible in your ears, it is most probably not the player that's to be blamed. By the way, you can't compare a former 500 GBP player with machines like the mentioned Linn which cost twice as much or more. Sure, you can always benefit from a bargain offer on the 2nd hand market, but then again the Marantz might be a steal for, say, 200 GBP or even less.
Sound Quality
Features
Value For Money
The Older The Better!
I originally owned a CD63SE (Special Edition) and have since owned a 67 OSE and 2 63 KI Sigs. The KI definately kicks butt, when compared to the lesser models. It's better, particularly at the frequency extremes: clearer treble and much better bass.
I experimented with some more modern transport/DAC set-ups for a while (after having my original 63 KI stolen), but missed that Marantz sound. Having realised that the modern machinery wasn't actually any better (contrary to what the manufacturers would have you believe) I bought my 2nd KI, second hand, and was happy to have 'that sound' back again. I had a 63 KI for about 7 years, in total.
So that's it then; an unreserved recomendation? Well, no it's not. I'll explain: While researching which modifications I should have done to improve this great player (to bring it up to true world beating performance) I was still thinking about the fact that newer doesn't necessarily mean better. So, I started researching more about that subject, aswell.
To cut to the chase, I bought myself an even older and cheaper multibit player, just to see (or hear) for myself. The result: it totally thrashed the CD63 KI Signature in every respect! It's made me wonder why (and how) I listened to my CDs on that player for so long!!!
The truth is that the manufacturers pretty much perfected the making of CD players a long time ago. Ever since then (with very few and very expensive exceptions) the changes that they've been making were to make the players cheaper to make, NOT better at playing CDs, no matter what the magazines say.
That seems a bit 'ad hominem', Billy!
I could provide a list,...... but, I won't.
Happy listening.
No. Nothing as sought after as that.
I'm just saying that, probably, any half decent MULTIBIT player, from an earlier era, and whether popular or not, sounds better.
I have listened to several popular, similarly priced (when new) models, and they all had better imaging, and bass, plus far superior rhythm and timing.
No. Nothing as sought after as that.
I'm just saying that, probably, any half decent MULTIBIT player, from an earlier era, and whether popular or not, sounds better.
I have listened to several popular, similarly priced (when new) models, and they all had better imaging, and bass, plus far superior rhythm and timing.
Are you referring to the Marantz CD80 ?
I'd be very interested to know the model of that "older and cheaper multibit player" you're speaking about. I own a CD63SE, a 6000OSE, and a 63KI, these are still among my favorite players, although I think some later players have more sophisticated D/A converters. The strength of models 63SE and KI is their deep soundstage, which normally only very expensive players can relay.
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
After A Lot Of 'googling' And Checking Of Various
After a lot of 'Googling' and checking of various reviews within the audiophile press I have opted for a used Marantz CD63 MkII KI Signature CD player to keep within my meagre buget of £200. What a difference from my previous model, an ancient, yet well regarded, Denon 1100 model: the sound of the Marantz is magical, most noticeable the width of the soundstage. Details are sharp and bass much more pronounced. I have noticed notes, sounds that I hadn't before. It is very musical in its output and together with my MF A1 amp I can understand that this may be, to some, over musical. Those who prefer a brighter sound would need a different combination, but my 57 year old ears enjoy it. Not being a CD nerd I can't comment on whats inside the unit, only on what comes out of my Mission e34 speakers, and that is now magic, pure magic!
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
Marantz Ki Signature Is Aclassy Performer But It
marantz ki signature is aclassy performer but it can't beat my Rotel 965bx. Even with steriods it won't come any close!!
The Marantz Cd63 Ki Signature Has Very Natural Sou
The Marantz CD63 KI signature has very natural sound and expressive, can handle all type of music.
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
I Have Owned My 63 Sig From New, Some 6-7 Years, W
I have owned my 63 sig from new, some 6-7 years, with out a doubt, the best CD player i have ever purchased! as people keep saying this machine is still currently better than a lot of £1000 players around today, go out and find one second hand, eBay is a good place, you will not be disappointed.
Brilliant machine, go find one, separation and placement of instruments good, imaging good, solid and reliable , if being picky a touch bass light? But nothing to worry about..
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
I Have Added This Review As I Have The Cd63 Se As
I have added this review as I have the CD63 SE as well. This is in my second system in the basement with Musical fidelity B1 amp and Mission 770 'silver' speakers ( £460) in their day. The KI is better. The midrange is slighty lower in volume level which has the effect of giving a more pronounced top end. The whole of the mid range has more detail and the SE mid range sounds harsh and muddled by comparison. I was happy with the SE untill I connected the KI. Don't get me wrong, the SE is good but the KI is definatley better. They are still both connected by identical interconnects. The SE is there as a spare now.
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
I Have Owned The Standard Cd-63mkii And The Ki Si
I have owned the standard CD-63mkII and the KI Sig version sounds nothing like it, the KI is in a much higher class in terms of sound quality and can often rival many more expensive players.
Value For Money
Sound Quality
Features
The Marantz Cd63 Ki Signature Is Definately The Be
The Marantz CD63 KI signature is definately the best cd player i've ever owned, having previously owned Denon, it is clear to see why so many people choose Marantz.
Value For Money
Features
Cd63 Ki. This Is A Fabulous Player.
CD63 KI. This is a fabulous player.
I've not had problems with the high output level. The built in electronic volume control works really well (if you did have a problem) and takes nothing away from the fabulous sound quality of this player.
The sound stage from this player is huge with great finesse as well. The player also feels well built. I don't intend parting with mine.
Q&A
There are no questions yet. Be the first to ask a question.