An Inconvenient Truth (U)

The graph and other supporting information used in 'An Inconvenient Truth' are totally incorrect. The famous hockey stick graph which shows that over the past 70-80 years the earth has warmed considerably has been shown to be false and has been removed from any further IPCC documentation.The 20 feet he suggests the oceans will rise is based on the IPCC's 10-20 inches. A major outright exaggeration of a worst case scenario which itself is based on pure hype. He keeps saying that the science is settled and the evidence is in, if this is the case why does Prof Paul Rieter say that this claim that the IPCC is a collection of 1500-2500 of the top climate scientists is simply not true. A lot of the people listed as part of the IPCC are hand picked by the various governments, some are even environmental activists. He was part of the IPCC body and was so disgusted by what he experienced and the bogus science that he resigned and had to threaten to sue them just to get his name taken off of their 'list of experts'.Robert M. Carter Marine Geologist at James Cook University of Australia says that nowhere does Al Gore tell his audience that all of the phenomena he describes fall in the natural range of environmental change on our planet.Dr William Gray emeritus professor of the atmospheric science dept Colorado State University says that Al Gore's one of these guys who preaches the end of the world and doesn't know what he's talking about and he's doing the public a great dis-service.

Professor Tim Ball Historical Climatologist is amazed at the junk science used in pushing this political agenda down our throats. He said the earth's climate is always changing; there have been many periods in the earth's history when it has been much warmer and much colder than it is now. These changes have occurred without any help from us humans. He goes on to say that during the 1400's there was a little ice age when even the river Thames completely iced up. During 1100-1300's it was much warmer than it is now. Throughout this time there were even vineyards in the UK some were even located in Scotland.The greatest problem with this whole situation is actually the people who see it, the vast majority of them will never question its truthfulness of examine any of it's claims.

I think this movie/documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, was very educational and I recommend it to every human being on earth.

I believe An Inconvenient Truth was packed full of agenda-driven propaganda. There is no scientific data to support it. Humanity has not been monitoring the planet's behaviour by the scientific method long enough to state any fact. There were just as many opinions against the hypothesis as for it, yet the Nobel panel lowered itself to estimating gesture and good intentions to be on par with the scientific method. I do not believe factual characterization to be offensive; only factual.

Al Gore, the man who used to be 'the next President of the USA' does an excellent job relating the message which is becoming an increasing concern. He lays down his point in a very persuasive and witty way. He presents some quite chilling illustrations of the changing landscape of this planet and suggests steps the world can take to combat the catastrophe. Delivering with the honesty, wit and charm he points out this moral issue as more dangerous the war on terror.