Epson Stylus Photo 895

Please flush out cheep ink and only use Epson ink with Epson paper the results will speak for them selves. I did use other ink and paper but I won,t clog up my printer again. I only have to clean my cart if I don,t use it for say 2 weeks. Keep the printer away from the radiator. Hope this helps you

I have had this printer for about 18 months. I bought it new and it wasn't cheap, which is my fault as I believed the hype and thought I was getting a good reliable printer.

he Epson Stylus Photo 895 printer is very noisy and it drinks ink. I am going to change to an ALL IN ONE very soon, and it will not be an EPSON!

I got the Epson Stylus Photo 895 printer at Argos when it was on special offer for about £60. I certainly didn't get my moneys worth.

It was one problem after another. This printer got me so frustrated it came to physical blows. I found the plastic casing cracked fairly easily.

This printer ended up in the bin, where it belongs.

I've used the Epson Stylus Photo 895 printer for about 2 years now. Like most of the readers here, I have wasted a lot of money on this piece of junk. Constant print head blockages - requiring on average 10 head cleans and 30 minutes of time wastage. Not to mention that this empties about 5% of the ink each time you do a clean.

Utter rubbish.

I bought the Epson Stylus Photo 895 printer from advice taken from online reviews. For the first few weeks all was well. However, if not used every day the print head blocked. By this time, the noise when printing was very annoying. Cleaning the print head (frequently) used a lot of ink. It became very expensive to run, as colours were all in one cartridge. As soon as I could afford it, I bought a Canon printer, and I am glad I learned from my mistake, though it did cost me !

I would advise anybody considering an Epson 895 printer to ask for a demo in the shop.

I paid quite a lot of money for this Epson Stylus Photo 895 printer so I would not have to waste any more time fiddling about with poor quality inkjet printers. Little did I know that price/reputation mean nothing in the world of inkjet printing. It's just as rubbish and just as expensive to run as my old HP inkjet (which I threw in the bin when it ate yet another cartridge).

Had mine for 12 months and very happy overall. Previous printer was an Epson 700 Photo which was a dog.

Would recomend the 895 as a dedicated photo printer and would also buy Epson inkjet product again.

Very disappointed with Epson Stylus 895. don't see why it should cost £200. Prints are very bad quality. They are better (may be good) if printed on Epson Glossy paper. I printed on Kodak Premium Glossy paper and the print quality is so disappointing. I did extended research before buying the product. Nowhere was it mentioned that you have to use Epson paper to get decent photograph. Yes, it does borderless printing. But the demerits outweigh the merits.

The Epson Stylus Photo 895 is a very good printer-2880 dpi plus you get card reader and you can print photos from your digital camera without computer. Printer is compatible with most digital cameras..