Doesn't let you cancel your membership, so you have to contact the customer support. This is a joke.

Terrible money grabbing. For anything electrical use Ebay, Ebuyer, Amazon and obviously have a good search on Google for your reviews. These all have good review forums, obviously where applicable, make sure they have had a lot of positive feedback (1000s+ preferably). It was good back in the day as a magazine, before computers, not a subscription service you can get for free elsewhere!

This is why I would not pay any attention to the Which review people,because in their opinion Aldi is the best supermarket of 2013. If you have been to one you will know that you cannot get half of the big brands that are available in other supermarkets like Asda,Morrisons,Sainsburys and Tesco. Aldi also offer so called deals on electricals and other goods saying that when its gone its gone,if thats the case how do they back up these products with accessories and spares. The answer is that they can't and you will have to seek out a specialists, but you are not able to because due to company's like Aldi talking there core product base they are no longer in business. Which have know idea about reviews and the fact that they are saying Aldi is Whis best supermarket 2013 only goes to prove it.

I want to launch a new campaign to make Which? stop scamming people into an expensive subscription through small print practices on the £1 trial offer. You should make it abundantly clear that without physically cancelling and contacting Which? customers will be liable for a staggering £9.75 a month. Although Which? does inform customers through an email that their subscription will be activated, it is an underhand and misleading way to sell your services. I have talked to several other people about this and they too have felt similarly tricked. I challenge Which? magazine to change YOUR ways. Disgusted.

I have a number of issues with Which: 1.It is good at handing out criticism, but not at receiving it. By the tone of the responses I can only assume it employs ex BBC staff. Should Which require examples I will gladly furnish them. My criticism has related to the inaccuracy of their reports on technical products and also the abysmal performance of their own search engine. 2.The way information is presented on their website could be much improved. 3.Reviews of technology items often contain up to 50% of reviews which were made between 12 and 18 months previously and in some cases two years. 4.Which is once again moving into the political arena. It obviously has a role in making members aware of issues that affect them and presenting the facts, but launching government 'campaigns' is not in my in my opinion the role of a consumer association. This could easily become a slippery slope.