Philips Philishave RQ1095 Arcitec Shaver Review

Click here if this is your business
★★★☆☆
3 / 5
From 5 reviews
40% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Value For Money

Guest's review of Philips Philishave RQ1095 Arcitec Shaver

★★☆☆☆

“I use Philishave machines for the last 45 years, and I...”

Written on: 30/08/2009

I use Philishave machines for the last 45 years, and I think my recent acquisition (RQ1095) is a fraud, at least when compared with my previous HQ8894 (because I just can't remember all the others):

1-HQ8894 charges for 1 hour and lasts 160 minutes; RQ1095 charges for the same hour and only lasts 65 minutes!

2-HQ8894 has a large capacity for cuted beard hairs that only need cleaning every 4 or 5 days; RQ1095 has to be cleaned every 2 days, maximum!

3-When batteries go out, on the HQ8894 you simply plug it and continue finishing your shaving; with the RQ1095 this is not possible, because you simply cannot connect the power cord to the machine!

4-The cutting capacity is better on the HQ8894 than on the new RQ1095;

5-The only thing that seems to work good is the expensive jet cleaning system.

  • Value For Money

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review
Was this review helpful? 0 0