Triumph Rocket III Touring Review

Click here if this is your business
★★★★★
4.9
100.0% of users recommend this
  • Build quality

  • Reliability

  • Value For Money

Click here if this is your business

dash23's review of Triumph Rocket III Touring

“I took ownership of a new Triumph Rocket III Touring...”

★★★★★

written by dash23 on 22/05/2008

Good Points
General finish, Quality of accessories, riding position, touring saddle comfort, rideability, power availability.

Bad Points
Clunky gearbox at the start. Lack of cruise control.

General Comments
I took ownership of a new Triumph Rocket III Touring on the 10th May 08, trading up from an 06 Kawasaki VN1600 Classic tourer. I purchased the bike from GT Motorcycles in St Austell.

The VN1600 is a heavy bike but not as heavy as the Rocket. However, the Rocket rides about 100lbs lighter, or so it seems. I got astride the Rocket III outside the shop and started it up. It sounds very quiet, probably too quiet for many, however, as I am looking at long distance riding, the quieter the better for me. I have never liked the boom boom of exhausts in my ears for long distances.

The bike moves slightly from side to side as you rev it. Not suprising when you think of the power waiting to be unleashed. I pulled in the clutch and gently depressed the gear lever into 1st. It went in easily although with a clunk. As I pulled away from the kerb I was suprised at how well the bike balanced on the road. In fact by the time I was up to 30 mph and in 3rd gear (each change with a clunk), I was smiling broadly at the smoothness and handling at low speed. I came up behind some stationary traffic at a set of lights and came down through the box, revving at each change, which alleviated the clunking noise from the gearbox a lot.

Pulling away from the lights, I engaged 2nd gear and opened the throttle a little to overtake a car. The response from the Rocket was a bit like kicking a sleeping dragon. I was past the car and back on my side of the road long before the approaching van got to me. By this time, I was in top and approaching 70 mph, with a smile on my face that allowed clouds of gnats to coat my teeth as I ploughed through them. I didn't care, though, I was having fun.

I was fairly gentle and careful through the first bends. New tyres, new bike but the Rocket was whispering to me "Don't worry, I'll stick". It did too, almost to a fault. It stayed on line through some fairly tight twisties although I didn't push it hard. It felt that there was plenty more to come once the tyres were scuffed up a bit and when I was more used to the handling.

Don't get me wrong, this is a mega tourer, not a sportsbike. Its never likely to lay over and allow you to get a knee on the deck, not without you having parted company with the machine first but its agile way beyond its weight and looks and it gives you confidence from the word go. You don't have to fight it in and out of bends or between cars when filtering. Its as nimble as it can be for its size. Great design and great engineering culminating in a machine that does what it was made for. I think the smaller wheels and narrower tyres than those on the original Rocket make this possible.

On the open road the new suspension is as it should be for a tourer. Its softer than on the original, although not spongy. It rides bumps well without transmitting shock to the riders back but doesn't "over bounce" like some tourers. The new forks give a positive feel to the front end, whether braking in straight line or powering over a bumpy road surface.

In conjunction with handling and suspension, I had a Triumph Touring seat fitted, with sissy bar and riders backrest. This saddle is great. The riders backrest tilts and swivels as you ride. I did a couple of 200 mile days without any difficulties and got off the bike feeling as though I could go another 200 mile with no problem.A cruise control would greatly add to the comfort on long runs as the throttle is quite hard to hold open for long distances. An electronic one should be fitted as standard on a tourer like this. The riding position is good for me. I am 6' 2". The only issues I had were with the roadster screen that comes as standard. For me it was just a little too low and gave me a fair amount of wind blast off of the top edge. I will buy one the taller screens before embarking on any long journeys in the future. However the standard screen is perfectly good for round town and everyday commuting and the quick release attachment/detachment locks are a joy to use. Another super piece of engineering.

Having completed the standard 500 miles and been to the dealer for its tightening up and first service, I took the Rocket out for a little "see how it goes" spin and was delighted by its handling at high speed. On an old airfield runway I saw 110 on the clock with some still left to go. Handling was still good at this speed although I will say it was a very still evening with no wind at all. In motorway conditions, with air currents from other vehicles and wind, I cannot see that Rocket would be greatly different. It is a heavy bike and is not subject to much interference from passing lorries etc.

There are some nice touches on the bike, like an info button on the throttle housing that cycles through the electronic pages of the instrument cluster.

The petrol tank comes with a standard unlockable filler cap. In this day and age I would have thought a lockable one should be standard.

I was returning on average 35/38mpg during running in and around 35mpg averaged. This gives roughly 170/190 miles to a tank. Not too bad I feel, considering what you are sitting on.

The amount of torque available at low rpm gives relaxed riding. You are not constantly up and down the box and yet dropping down a cog and opening the throttle gives a response that has you hanging on tightly as you wait for your eyebrows to catch up. I am not saying that if you were given the choice between a ride on the Rocket III Touring and a guaranteed night of passion with Angelina Jolie, you would take the Rocket but it would be a close run thing.

I had the touring saddle, sissy bar, riders backrest, heated grips, protection rails for panniers, front engine bars, oval mirrors, locking filler cap, alarm/immobiliser fitted from new.

The clunking from the gearbox has reduced significantly as miles goes on but I read on other sites that this is normal?

To sum up my experience so far, with 800 miles on the clock at this time, I am delighted with the Rocket III Touring. It is everything I hoped it would be. It's a docile, easily to ride tourer around town and in traffic but on the open road it brings the best of its mighty brother in its genes and although slightly de-powered in its tourer guise, these genes allow it to do what it was designed to do. It makes me smile most of the time and when not smiling, its because I am full out laughing like a maniac, wondering when the fun will stop. Not for a long time I think.

  • 2008

    Year Manufactured

  • 11 days

    Length of ownership

  • Build quality

  • Reliability

  • Value For Money

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Tom H's Response to dash23's Review

Written on: 24/05/2008

Always good to read such a good review.<br/>How did you find the dealer in St Austell where you bought it from?

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

455621_Tmblweed's Response to dash23's Review

Written on: 22/04/2009

I'm in the States and recently had a Vulcan 1600 Classic that I put 19,500 miles on. Today I am going to test out an 08 R3T bike, will let you know how I see it. Later

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Dash23's Response to dash23's Review

Written on: 27/06/2008

Hi guys,
<br/>Sorry for the late reply but I work away from home a lot and do not have access to e mail all the time. In reply to the Nomad/Rocket question I would say that the Rocket drives lighter although its heavier. Balance is an engineering design problem that I think Triumph have solved superbly in the Rocket III touring. Thats not to say that the Nomad is a bad bike. I enjoyed every mile on it. But you pay for the extra in the price of the bike, as with most things.
<br/>My Nomad was very quick for a 700lbs V twin. I had V&H dual bagger exhaust, Barron Big air kit, K&N filter and Power Commander III on it and it was a very respectable ride, However the Rocket is more comfortable, easier to drive in traffic and loads faster on the open road. In monetary terms I suppose there is an argument for the Vulcan/Nomad being a better buy but if you add the cost of the above extras theres only a couple of grand in it and with the Rocket, you do not really need to add anything to make it into a dream of a machine. I have owned many bikes but would say that the Rocket is really the first bike I have fallen in love with from the word go. It's an engineering marvel, Its stirs my soul every time I start it up. If you are in the market for a serious touring machine and you have the little bit of extra money, I think you would buy the Triumph after test driving all the alternatives. I don't have a particular penchant for a specific maker, I just know what I want from a bike and the Triumph for me has it all in one package. Its engineered for a task and it does exactly what the engineers designed it to do, in spades.
<br/>Test drive one and see.
<br/>Dave

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Ivymike's Response to dash23's Review

Written on: 26/06/2008

I agree with this review because...I've experienced just what the reviewer has experienced with over 5000 miles on my 2007 Rocket III Classic Tourer.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Sa1102998's Response to dash23's Review

Written on: 25/06/2008

The Rocket 3 Touring sounds like my kind of bike. I would like to know how the VN 1600 compares to the R3. Would you mind elaborating on the pros and cons between the two? I have come down to two choices the new 2008 1600 Nomad and or the 2008 Rocket 3 Touring for my next bike.
<br/>Thanks Shane.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Sa1102998's Response to dash23's Review

Written on: 25/06/2008

Hi I'm Shane I toook a test ride on the vn1600 Nomad I thought it was good. I have to make a choice VN1600 Nomad or Rocket 3 touring aside from the obvious power differance how did the VN stack up with the Rocket in the long distance department?

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Dash23's Response to dash23's Review

Written on: 24/05/2008

Hi Tom,
<br/>I originally brought my Vulcan 1600 from GT in Plymouth and got a very good deal from St Austell against the Rocket III. They are also decent friendly people who are into bikes, not just salesmen. Important if you need to go back for anything.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0