Triumph Daytona 1200 Review

Click here if this is your business
Triumph Daytona 1200
★★★★★
4.6
96.0% of users recommend this
  • Build quality

  • Reliability

  • Value For Money

Click here if this is your business

BimotaRich's review of Triumph Daytona 1200

“I have owned several 90's Triumphs and they have all...”

★★★★☆

written by BimotaRich on 20/03/2007

Good Points
Bullet proof reliability, addictive power, and handsome good looks make this a very fine motorcycle to own and ride. It is great for sport touring as it can carry a lot of luggage and a passenger with ease and its large gas tank allows for 200 miles between fill ups. The fairings do a good job of keeping wind and rain off for a sport bike. It hands well for its old school layout and size but requires skillful use of the throttle to keep the suspension settled. Great for sweepers and high ways! Can you hang on till it hits TOP SPEED? Nice sound but not too loud. A gentleman's sport bike.

Bad Points
The bike is a bit top heavy and can be a real handful in technical twisties. It is not a beginners bike! The brakes are average at best (though much improved after I had them rebuilt). The mileage is not so good and it likes a steady diet of hi octane fuel. Runs a bit hot in stop and go traffic in the summer heat.

General Comments
I have owned several 90's Triumphs and they have all been perfectly reliable. I have never had a problem with any of them. The Daytona however is by far my favorite. I liked it so well that I brought it along with me to Japan when I changed jobs. It handles better than the same year Speed Triple, has more torque, and is just as comfy. The looks still turn heads even 12 years after it rolled off the show room floor. People are shocked when I tell them it's a 95. She is still a beauty! I commute, tour, and sport ride on it which pretty much makes the Daytona a UBM (Universal British Motorcycle). And most importantly chicks still dig it! And you can pick up good example fairly cheap. I would recommend looking for the 97 version which had upgraded brakes if you are interested in sportbike riding. Otherwise just look for a clean example and enjoy!

  • 1995

    Year Manufactured

  • 9 years

    Length of ownership

  • Build quality

  • Reliability

  • Value For Money

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Cherokeedaytona's Response to BimotaRich's Review

Written on: 12/09/2007

Hi I have a Daytona 1200 limited in black. 1998. I need a new petrol tank. It was damaged by vandals, any advise where I can get a replacement.

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Bimotarich's Response to BimotaRich's Review

Written on: 13/09/2007

What country are you in? I luckily almost never need any parts but when I do the folks at Donnelson Cycle in St. Louis have been very helpful and I can often get parts from them cheaper and faster (even with shipping figured in) than I could if I ordered parts from a Triumph dealer here in Japan. The tank on the Daytona 1200 is about the same as all the early Hinkley Triumph models (thunderbirds excluded). So a tank from a speed triple, Daytona, or Trophy from the early 90s should fit. Most of the colors back then were the same as Ford paint as well. Good luck!

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0