SeaLife SharkDiver SL 300 Review

Click here if this is your business
2.7 / 5
From 3 reviews
33% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Value For Money

DinghySailor's review of SeaLife SharkDiver SL 300


“The Sea Life Shark Diver SL 300 was a waste of money...”

Written on: 08/09/2006 by DinghySailor (1 review written)

Good Points
It was waterproof, and didn't leak down to 3-4m. It could also be used as a traditional compact camera.

Bad Points
Out of 3x36 exposure films used, a total of 69 photographs were available from the developer. The camera often would not take a photograph when the shutter was pressed.
Of the 69 photographs all but about 3 were unusable - the colour underwater was appalling, and the flash didn't seem to work properly. The photographs were blurred as though there was a slow shutter speed. This was even obvious on a beach shot in early afternoon in Egypt!

General Comments
The Sea Life Shark Diver SL 300 was a waste of money sadly, and a disappointment since the holiday was a once-in-a-lifetime one, and photos of dolphins, clown fish, parrot fish and puffer fish were all wasted and lost. An expensive waste I'm afraid.

  • Value For Money

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Report this review
Was this review helpful? 0 0