Thai Dicq Shack Cafe, St Clement Review

Click here if this is your business
★★★★☆
3.9
From 9 reviews
78.0% of users recommend this
  • Quality of service

  • Quality of food

  • Value For Money

Click here if this is your business

Lord Mace's review of Thai Dicq Shack Cafe, St Clement

“The whole event at the English Thai Dicq Shack Cafe ...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by Lord Mace on 15/09/2005

Good Points
Nice outlook.

Bad Points
Staff rude and very argumentitive.

General Comments
The whole event at the English Thai Dicq Shack Cafe was a complete sham. From the time we entered to the time we left. The staff were rude and unhelpful.

  • Over £25

    Average cost per head

  • First time

    How often do you eat here?

  • Family-oriented

    Atmosphere

  • Quality of service

  • Quality of food

  • Value For Money

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

Markapeel's Response to Lord Mace's Review

Written on: 17/02/2006

Lord Mace does not have a clue what he is on about. Reading his reviews you can tell this person does not like change and loves golf and anything assosicated with it. I feel his review is absolutely nonsense, he has upgraded all places in his area but abroad Costa Del Sol and Jersey, he slated the whole lot. From my experience the place he slated in Jersey is the best family oriented, value for money, great views and the staff are extyremely helpful. In fact it is the most popular THAI KITCHEN in Jersey so you have got something wrong. SORRY LORD MACE, not everyone will kiss your feet when you enter a building. People like you do not spend money any more (they spend time with unjust worthy reviews) so the catering industry actually caters for middle of the road. So what do you really expect for your money these days?

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0