written by Cavaliernigelgreengrass on 20/06/2017
I have used Viking for many years, I no longer have an account manager, they have tried increasing prices drastically. Look at this dialogue for customer service, it also turned out that the person I dealt with had not left Viking and reverted my price back to the original price. Also don't be fooled by Viking's 99p per ream A4 paper price you can only by this on one occasion.
It is the end of the line between me & Viking.
From: Viking
Sent: 25 May 2017
To:
Subject: Re: Viking
This man is no longer with the company. I can only go by what I have here and that paper was not on a fixed a price. As a company we will not be selling anything below cost.It states on your special price list that all prices are subject to industry wide change. We are not able to call every customer to let them no about a price increase. We do not have the time for that.
You no longer have an account manager as Viking have removed this service.
Thanks
Viking
Account Manager
The information contained in this message is confidential and may contain privileged work product or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the above and delete this message and any attachments. Please also note that transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Thank you.
On 25 May 2017 at 12:55, Yes, but surely you would have the courtesy of advising on an increase especially when its nearly 40% increase
From: Viking
Sent: 25 May 2017 To:
Subject: Re: Viking
All prices as subject to industry wide change
Viking
Account Manager
The information contained in this message is confidential and may contain privileged work product or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the above and delete this message and any attachments. Please also note that transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Thank you.
On 25 May 2017 wrote:
OK I will cancel the order, I cannot believe you have put the price up 60p per ream without letting me know, what awful customer service.
From: Viking
Sent: 25 May 2017 To: Subject: Re: Viking
Hi
There is no agreed price on your account for £1.59.That is below cost. I can not match that price as below cost. If you refuse delivery it will be returned to the warehouse and a credit will be raised for you.
Thanks
Viking
Account Manager
Viking
The information contained in this message is confidential and may contain privileged work product or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the above and delete this message and any attachments. Please also note that transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Thank you.
On 25 May 2017 at 12:44,
wrote:
I have agreed with the person I dealt with a price of £1.59 for a pallet of paper, If you are charging £2.19 I don’t want it, the product code you are supplying is different to the paper we normally order, If you are charging £2.19 I will instruct our warehouse team not to unload the delivery.
From: Viking
Sent: 25 May 2017 12:41
To:
Subject: Re: Viking
Hi
No I have sent the right paper. Your price was wrong. This paper was not £1.59 that is below cost.
Thanks
Viking
Account Manager
The information contained in this message is confidential and may contain privileged work product or confidential information. If you have received this message in error, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please notify the above and delete this message and any attachments. Please also note that transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Thank you.
On 25 May 2017 at 12:03,
wrote:
This looks like you are providing the incorrect paper, the paper we require is as attached.
Regards