Report Abuse

Report this review to the Review Centre Team

Here at Review Centre we work hard to make sure we are the best place on the internet for honest, unbiased consumer reviews - we are grateful for your help in keeping us that way!


Why are you reporting this review?

If you represent this business why not claim your page by creating a Free Business Account where you will receive improved review monitoring functionality.


“The Sea Life Shark Diver SL 300 was a waste of money...”

Written on: 08/09/2006 by DinghySailor (1 review written)

Good Points
It was waterproof, and didn't leak down to 3-4m. It could also be used as a traditional compact camera.

Bad Points
Out of 3x36 exposure films used, a total of 69 photographs were available from the developer. The camera often would not take a photograph when the shutter was pressed.
Of the 69 photographs all but about 3 were unusable - the colour underwater was appalling, and the flash didn't seem to work properly. The photographs were blurred as though there was a slow shutter speed. This was even obvious on a beach shot in early afternoon in Egypt!

General Comments
The Sea Life Shark Diver SL 300 was a waste of money sadly, and a disappointment since the holiday was a once-in-a-lifetime one, and photos of dolphins, clown fish, parrot fish and puffer fish were all wasted and lost. An expensive waste I'm afraid.

Was this review helpful? 0 0