Sony DCR-TRV16E

Easy to use. Very good lense. Very sturdy and well build in Japan.

I bought my Sony DCR-TRV16E in 2002. It is still a workhorse. Use it in all kind of conditions. But 80% in winter and snow.I run a sleddogteam as a musher. And I filmed a lot while standing on the sled with the dogs running. Sometimes something goes wrong in those circumstances. Because my 8 sleddogs run very fast and do not like to stop. Two times my 16E was completely covered with snow after falling of the sled on full speed. It still works flawlessly. Picture quality is more than excellent.

I bought the Sony DCR-TRV16E(4 camcorder second hand a few years ago, and was very pleased with the quality of the video, and ease of use. The full test of the durability came when i accidentally left it in a stove, and later lit the stove by mistake! After a few hours in the oven the plastic on the bottom of the camcorder melted, (i had to open the tape slot with a screw driver) as well as around the lens, but the camcorder still worked fine!- an excellent testament to the durability of this Sony product (and to my own stupidity!)For the price you can't do any better than this camcorder.

Sony equipment has in the main being excellent from my experience, and the Sony DCR-TRV16E is no exception.

I thoroughly researched a lot of cameras within my budget and this camera came out on top. I must note that I am in Australia and my camera was bought here. Except for a couple of features it is basically the same model as the UK one. I bought the TRV 16-E which is almost the same as the TRV 18-E except it doesn't have the memory stick option. It's a feature I can live without, and I don't want to spend a lot more just for that one feature.

This model is packed with features which you can brief yourself on the Sony websites. I have worked as a professional cameraman so I appreciate good quality stuff. This may not offer professionals everything but it'll please everyone else. Professionals will appreciate higher picture quality, but regular consumers, quite honestly probably won't notice too much of a difference in picture quality but its there, believe me! Has better resolution especially when you're editing and using it on HDTV.

Professionals will also appreciate the 'ring focus' that performs admirably in manual mode and easier to get to while recording. As oppose to the old clumsy wheel-selector focus button. I never use auto focus I prefer manual focusing everything, but for average consumers auto focus performs fine. One thing I would have preferred is the ability to make the viewfinder Black and White, it's much harder to rack focus on a color viewfinder. Don't be sucked in by 1000000000000X Digital Zooms, it has absolutely no use for me and it really guts the picture if you use it, always use optical zoom or get closer to the subject.

Don't be fooled by the small tapes that are just a little bigger than answer machine micro tapes. They can hold almost twice as much detail as VHS tape, but the trade-off is that 60sp, 90lp is as much tape that is going to fit on it. But I hear they are planning on building tapes that can store more minutes. These MiniDV tapes are ideal for long storage, they have better resiliency than analog storage mediums, VHS, 8mm, C-VHS etc.

Audio quality is MUCH higher than any analog camcorder. A nice feature allows you to squeeze two stereo soundtracks, so you can dub audio onto your recordings i.e. narrations using a slightly lower quality setting (12 Bit), there's a higher 16 Bit quality that allows the best possible audio (Stereo) recording but no dubbing over 16Bit. Good!

If you're using computer-editing, Premiere for instance, I'd suggest using 16 BIT audio. You won't be able to dub narration with your camera but on the computer you can add as many soundtracks as you want, narration, sound effects, music etc with better control and gaining best quality audio of all sound tracks.

Incidentally my former camera that is now taking the backseat to this new one was an Analog Sony Video Camcorder. The newer model is lighter, smaller, has faster response mechanisms in VCR mode.

Mind you I still use the old Analog one, the new camera has A/V inputs and I can dub my old Camcorder material, not to mention VHS tapes, or anything analog. Then I can dump footage on my computer, edit, and export to it to what ever I want. A neat thing to do is to convert all your VHS tapes into VCD/DVD's.. save you a lot of space! Another reason not to throw your old camera is that you can set up a two angle shooting method for anything. Then when you edit all your material on the computer (best editing method, otherwise you do a lot of fast forwarding, rewinding and math with analog methods) you can do some nice cutting between two angles.

I have only tried a handful of features. Firewire connection is the best for editing. Be warned you will need a fast (PIII, PIV equivalent or more) computer, big (use 13 gigs for half an hour of footage as a guide) fast Hard Disk and at the very least 128 Ram. A good editing package is the aforementioned Adobe Premiere 6.5. The camera comes with a bundle of decent transition effects that you will have to plan and execute on location, but I would suggest if you can, use the camera to capture you raw footage and then add all your transition in Adobe Premiere 6.5. This saves you from having to think and plan transitions while recording. It helps you distribute your projects, burn your home videos on CDs.

A good method for exporting your stuff is to keep your raw footage on a MiniDV tape. Then capture it on your computer, edit it, then export it to a different MiniDV (for storage and use as a master). You may choose to also make a CD right away. From that master miniDV make VHS tapes. And should you decide later on to make CDs you always have your master miniDV tapes to reload on the computer should, so you don't have to keep those big captured original files on your computer. And you have the original raw footage on yet another MiniDV just incase you want to rework your stuff! That's how I do my stuff.

The very clear LCD screen is neat, something I've never used before. I think it's clearer than the viewfinder, clear enough for me to do some accurate follow-focus. It allows me to get nice high camera angles and do some nifty moves.

It has some features for night lighting that I haven't tried but I always find, and quite obvious, that the more ambient light there is the better the picture is. Otherwise you get grain; I don't know how this deals with dim photography. If I do dark shooting I go manual on exposure so that the camera doesn't gain and grain up the picture, use external lighting rigs whenever I do night shooting.

Buy it!

I found this Sony DCR-TRV16e digital camcorder to be a fantastic piece of equipment and found it easy to learn. The default picture quality may fool you into thinking it's average but when you learn the menu and the control you have it over it with some easy options (light conditions, white balance, shutter speed) you can get some great pictures. The carl zeiss lens definitely helps as does the welcome addition of a manual focus.

I often video concerts for later watching and found no need to use a seperate microphone as the built-in one is superb.

This sony DCR-TRV16e digital camcorder is fantastic. Very light, easy to operate with fantastic picture and sound quality.

The LCD screen is very clear, lots of buttons to play with, the menu system is idiot proof! with a myriad of settings, nice steady zoom, the 120 digital zoom is rather grainy.

In all a great little piece of 'kit'. The nightscope is fantastic for '0' lux pictures.