Poorest customer service I ever had

Hope Valley Saddlery - www.hopevalleysaddlery.co.uk
★★☆☆☆
2.0
24.0% of users recommend this
  • Value For Money

Kilu's review of Hope Valley Saddlery - www.hopevalleysaddlery.co.uk

“Poorest customer service I ever had”

★☆☆☆☆

written by Kilu on 16/08/2015

I was looking for a long time on the internet to find a pair of Aquacat boots, because I already have a pair of the same brand and after nearly ten years, I needed a new pair. I did not find the boots anywhere in Europe. Then, I found the boots on that website.
I ordered a pair of the Aquacat riding boots. I wore them for only some weeks. After the short time, the inner of the tongues of the boots lost their colour and the leather was broken. I was very disappointed of the quality of the shoes and because my old pair lasted for so many years, I thought there could be a manufacturing problem.
So I wrote an e-mail including photos to show the problem. I received an answer that I had to forward my photos to the return service. I mailed the photos again and had no answer for some days. After I mailed again, I received a message.
They said that after seeing my photos, they saw no problem but only "normal tear and wear" which was for them not exceptional after that time.
I answered again that for me a boot of that price range (60 GBP) should not be in such a condition after that short time of wearing. I had no answer in return.

Until now, I always had good experience in customer service on shopping sites, but for this time I am very very disappointed because I had the impression that they did not even try to solve the problem.

  • Value For Money

Hopevalleysaddlery's Response to Kilu's Review

Written on: 15/06/2016

Hi

We are sorry to read this review and do remember the order in question. When a customer uses a product, and subsequently claims it is faulty, we have to be clear that the fault has not been caused by either normal wear and tear, or misuse of the boots by the customer. These boots were not indestructible, and sadly we could not agree that the boots were faulty - we felt that they had not been properly cared for. Despite this, we did contact the manufacturer, in case they had a different opinion. This would have enabled us to provide a replacement or refund. We forwarded the images and complaint to the manufacturer, and the delay in responding was caused by us waiting for a response. The manufacturer agreed that the boots were not faulty. We understood your view that the boots costing £60 should last longer, however we do believe that it is all about how you treat a pair of boots. We would love to have resolved this to your satisfaction, but sadly this was not possible due to our differing views.

Reply to this comment
Was this review helpful? 0 0