<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/styles/rss.xsl?t=itm&amp;i=147806" type="text/xsl" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/reviews147806.html"><title>Samsung D75 reviews from Review Centre.</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/reviews147806.html</link><description>Last ten Samsung D75 reviews from Review Centre.</description><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher><dc:date>2009-11-29T15:51+00:00</dc:date><dc:creator>Webmaster (mailto:rss-webmaster@reviewcentre.com) </dc:creator><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase>2004-01-01T00:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><image rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/images/rss_logo.gif" /><textinput rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/search.php" /><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review589475.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review586461.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review584113.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review583559.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review578390.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review534510.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review518617.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review513525.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review500194.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review485657.html" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><image rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/images/rss_logo.gif"><title>Samsung D75 reviews from Review Centre.</title><url>http://www.reviewcentre.com/images/rss_logo.gif</url><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/reviews147806.html</link></image><textinput rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/search.php"><title>Search Digital Cameras</title><description>Search Review Centre's Digital Cameras reviews.</description><name>search_topic_id=10&amp;searchstring</name><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/search.php</link></textinput><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review589475.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 8/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review589475.html</link><description><![CDATA[Good camera and having used this for a while now, its fine for us.   However, we've lost the software ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-11-01T23:35+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review586461.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 8/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review586461.html</link><description><![CDATA[its really good except that the flash does'nt work sometimes! :((((]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-25T01:04+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review584113.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 8/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review584113.html</link><description><![CDATA[i realy like the D75, ive had it for a long time, i also own the D73, wich although seamd to have more ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-19T08:38+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review583559.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 6/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review583559.html</link><description><![CDATA[I have one of these cameras now for over a year, it as been a good one for taking photos outdoors, ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-17T03:07+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review578390.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 8/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review578390.html</link><description><![CDATA[I actually got my d75 second hand, and it's a lot better than I thought it would be, there are a lot ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-03T18:45+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review534510.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 7/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review534510.html</link><description><![CDATA[The Samsung D75 is a really good camera, clear pictures and easy to use but it seemed to use batterys ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-06-06T13:05+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review518617.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 6/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review518617.html</link><description><![CDATA[Samsung D75 is an ok basic camera which for the price is adequate in all area's except battery life. ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Hussydog</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-04-27T01:15+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review513525.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 4/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review513525.html</link><description><![CDATA[Over all the Samsung D75 is a good camera, it is not the most expensive one but for my purposes it ... ]]></description><dc:creator>alan winfield</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-04-13T20:26+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review500194.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 6/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review500194.html</link><description><![CDATA[Samsung D75 is a nice camera and ideal for family photos. As I said above the batteries seem to ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-03-09T00:05+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review485657.html"><title>Samsung D75 (Rated 10/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review485657.html</link><description><![CDATA[All round not bad, The Samsung D75 is light and compact, takes a good photo but battery's don't last ... ]]></description><dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-02-03T00:05+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2009 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item></rdf:RDF>
