<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/styles/rss.xsl?t=cat&amp;i=97" type="text/xsl" ?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/products97.html"><title>Processors reviews from Review Centre</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/products97.html</link><description>Last ten Processors reviews from Review Centre.</description><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher><dc:date>2008-04-22T01:06+00:00</dc:date><dc:creator>Webmaster (mailto:rss-webmaster@reviewcentre.com) </dc:creator><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase>2004-01-01T00:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><image rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/Images/rss_logo.gif" /><textinput rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/search.php" /><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review334154.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review316663.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review304073.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review304067.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review252870.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review242289.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review236380.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review236151.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review233609.html" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review233603.html" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><image rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/Images/rss_logo.gif"><title>Processors reviews from Review Centre</title><url>http://www.reviewcentre.com/Images/rss_logo.gif</url><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/products97.html</link></image><textinput rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/search.php"><title>Search Computer Hardware</title><description>Search Review Centre's Computer Hardware reviews.</description><name>search_topic_id=3&amp;searchstring</name><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/search.php</link></textinput><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review334154.html"><title>AMD Athlon 64 (Rated 10/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review334154.html</link><description>* Extremely powerful* Gives off less heat than the Pentium 4* Has the memory controller built in unlike ... </description><dc:creator>geefour</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-03-09T13:18+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review316663.html"><title>Intel Pentium D 915 2.8 GHz (Rated 9/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review316663.html</link><description>I have been using this processor from last one year and its doing really well. The maximum clock speed ... </description><dc:creator>dani1980</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-01-29T10:36+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review304073.html"><title>AMD Opteron 165 1.8 GHz Retail Processor (Rated 10/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review304073.html</link><description>Having used a 165 Dual core Opteron now for almost 2 years, it has been the most reliable chip I have ... </description><dc:creator>weesteev</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-01-02T16:06+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review304067.html"><title>Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.40 GHz Boxed Processor (Rated 10/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review304067.html</link><description>This chip will come in 2 variants with a lower stepping more energy efficient chipset available for ... </description><dc:creator>weesteev</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-01-02T16:00+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review252870.html"><title>AMD Athlon 64 X2 3600+ (Rated 9/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review252870.html</link><description>When I was upgrading to Windows Vista, I was informed that I didn't need any new hardware. Nevertheless, ... </description><dc:creator>kiyawhite</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-07-25T11:36+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review242289.html"><title>Intel Core 2 E6300 (Rated 10/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review242289.html</link><description>I've had the Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 since November '06. For the first couple months I left it at stock ... </description><dc:creator>happydan</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-05-10T09:48+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review236380.html"><title>ETower 633 (Rated 10/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review236380.html</link><description>It's not a bad computer not to expensive and I'm using it right now lol!</description><dc:creator>BIMMER</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-03-16T13:29+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review236151.html"><title>Intel Xpro (Rated 7/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review236151.html</link><description>If you got the dollars get it</description><dc:creator>cobratoolbox</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-03-14T17:36+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review233609.html"><title>AMD Athlon XP (Rated 8/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review233609.html</link><description>I have Athlon XP 1900+ (1.6GHZ) processor that is based on Palomino core.  With special copper heatsink, ... </description><dc:creator>photoman</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-02-21T19:01+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item><item rdf:about="http://www.reviewcentre.com/review233603.html"><title>Intel Pentium III (Rated 10/10)</title><link>http://www.reviewcentre.com/review233603.html</link><description>I use Intel Pentium III processor on two computers.  Two are Slot 1 Pentium III 800E with 256K cache ... </description><dc:creator>photoman</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-02-21T18:51+00:00</dc:date><dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2008 Resource Team Ltd.</dc:rights><dc:publisher>reviewcentre.com</dc:publisher></item></rdf:RDF>