Have a picture of Land Of The Dead?, please send it to us.
| Value for Money | 7.5/10  |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 7.5/10 |
| Land Of The Dead (2005) |  | £13.97P&P - Check site |
| Land Of The Dead/Shaun Of The Dead | | £21.24P&P - Check site |
| Land Of The Dead/Texas Chainsaw Massacre | | £21.24P&P - Check site |
Full review by
PixieOfDoom
on 18th Oct 2005
User Rating : 5
Respect :
0
Land of the Dead is an ambitious movie that ultimately manages to fail in most of its aims.
Superfically it's the 4th in George Romero's zombie movies. Mankind has been all but eliminated and is forced to live in walled cities and make raids on the small towns which were abandoned years before to get supplies. There is no mention of what will happen when they run out of towns to raid.... The rich live in great luxury while the poor subsist on scraps and are kept happy with "bread and circuses."
Unfortunately the zombies are starting to become sentient and learn to use tools and weapons just as the most powerful weapon in the city's arsenal is stolen by an unhappy minion....
Ok, it's a zombie movie, but the zombies are extraneous to the plot which is more about the relationship between the rich and poor in a post-apocalyptic society. Dennis Hopper plays a creepy gangster cum leader and John Leguizamo is always convincing but there is no motivation for any character in this film. Why would Leguizamo destroy an entire city because he can't get the apartment he wants? His character is neither crazy nor evil so his actions make no sense. Why is Riley, the good guy, so good? Why does he do his job? Why does he want to leave? Why does the female lead suddenly decide to help Riley out? What's in it for her? Nothing.
Then there's the political threads. The zombies do make an effective symbol in that Romero uses them to suggest that anyone who has may one day not have - e.g. anyone can sustain a bite. There's a suppressed revolutionary group who want Riley to help them so that wealth can be more evenly distributed but they warrant about 2 minutes of screen time. Why even write it into the plot if you're not going to use it?
Romero started out with some interesting ideas but completely fails to explore them. The organized zombies, not explained. The ability of humans to sustain themselves for years without means of planting crops, manufacturing, etc. - not explained, yet some people do live in vast luxury just like before. The motivations of the characters - not there. The development of various plot threads, noon-existent.
Don't get me wrong, it was an entertaining 90 minutes of film, but it wasn't very scary, and it just left me wondering where the other half of the story went.
PixieOfDoom's review and ratings | 408 words
Review by
Stunt Gerbil
on 26th Sep 2005
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
George A Romero has returned to his zombie film series for the fourth time, with perhaps his greatest and most ambitious movie yet.
In the last film, Day of the Dead (1985), military and scientific communities were presented as the real menace to society, as zombies outside the compound began to be realised as sympathetic victims. This theme continues in Land Of The Dead, as the cult director offers his most complex and political vision of society. The zombies are now a sad underclass living o ...
Stunt Gerbil's full review | 409 words
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
