Have a picture of RICTA www.writerspace.net/ricta?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of FrancisQ.
| Ease Of Site Navigation | 9.5/10 |
|---|---|
| Quality of Content | 9.5/10 |
| Value for Money | 5/10 |
| Overall rating | 9/10 |
Full review by
FrancisQ![]()
on 28th Jul 2005
![]()
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
Good Points: I like this site mainly for three things: 1 - its ease of use. 2 - its high standard of writing. 3 - its radical community.
Bad Points: There's nothing majorly bad that I can think of, I suppose it would be nice to have more writers and more content to read.
General comments: I came across RICTA http://writerspace.net/ricta/ by chance googling something else and as soon as I saw it I liked the atmosphere. I followed the postings for a while before signing up and submitting some of my own writing. The current group of writers are very talented; the site is open to newcomers all the time so long as they are intent on participating and not just there as joy-riders. Mmm what else can I say? I find the simple style really effective and the way the page makes you feel like reading from a book. I think the playwriting projects are interesting though I haven't been able to participate in one yet, I enjoyed reading them. That's about it really. Just a great site for writers, beats most for its dedication and hard work I'd say...
FrancisQ's review and ratings | 183 words
Review by
FrancisQ![]()
on 28th Jul 2005
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
RICTA (Research In Contemporary Theatre Arts) is the initiative of Andrew Eglinton, a researcher in contemporary Japanese and British theatre. The site is set up on a 'shared knowledge' basis meaning that it aims to gather a wealth of information on theatre from its readers and other researchers or practioners. At the time of writing the site was still in its early days and was somewhat lacking in information. However, the layout and design is clear and concise, the ideas are sound, the motivati ...
FrancisQ's full review | 142 words

Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?