Have a picture of Gamo Stutzen .177?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of pindio.
| Accuracy | 6.3/10  |
|---|---|
| Handling | 7.3/10 |
| Value for Money | 7.7/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 7.7/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.6/10  |
Full review by
thepaladin
on 22nd Apr 2008
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
Good Points: Beautiful rifle, solid, accurate, pretty much everything
Bad Points: Well, a little heavy.... but not bad
General comments: I have just gotten this rifle. It's not quite broken in yet, but it has already settled in pretty well. I may add anything new later, but for now this is a great rifle.
It's not a magnum rifle so anything much beyond squirrel or possibly rabbit it your comfortable you can get a head shot would be too much. Loading takes a little getting used to with a scope as the breach opens just in front of the scope.
I recommend this rifle highly.
thepaladin's review and ratings | 99 words
Review by
marko87
on 5th Apr 2008
User Rating : 6
Respect :
0
Nice in appearance and fun to shoot. Accuracy however, is unsat. I've tried light ammo and heavy ammo of all shapes and sizes, but the gun I purchased will throw a flyer about every 4th shot. It will shoot fairly accurate with one pellet style one day and be totally out in left field the next with the same setup. I shoot from a bench with a scope. My gun is going on the auction block.
marko87's full review | 84 words
Review by
BigShow
on 19th Jul 2005
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
First let me say that I know my air guns.
I'v owned many guns like haenel, gamo and walther. I have had the Gamo Stutzen .177 air rifle for about five years now and I still use it a lot, (about 10.000 rounds so far) many say that it is expensive but look at it! (I paid 280€)
Firing: The gun is quite loud, which I like, but not everyone does. (huge bang!)
When using standard pellets (Gamo match, bulldog...) it is powerfull but nothing extraordinary, even gamo's magnum pellets feel a bit ...
BigShow's full review | 251 words | 5 comments added.
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
