Have a picture of Panasonic MC-E8003?, please send it to us.
| Ease of Use | 1.9/10   |
|---|---|
| Durability | 2.4/10 |
| Style | 4.4/10 |
| Service & Support | 0.3/10 |
| Value for Money | 1.4/10 |
| Overall rating | 1/10 |
Full review by
MickPont
on 1st Jan 2008
User Rating : 0
Respect :
0
Good Points: none
General comments: When I first got it I took it apart a few times trying to find out what was blocking it. Nothing but dust, it seems.
Panasonic make great TVs - but I wouldn't go near one of their vacuum cleaners again. I can't believe this got past their quality assurance process.
The handle on the dust collector looks like a place to pick up the cleaner - so you keep pulling out the dust collector instead of picking up the vacuum.
There are wheels on the suction end which leaev a gap between the floor and the sucker, so breaking the vacuum and leaving lots of fluff on the floor.
The dust collector is hard to get dust out of, so you end up with dust everywhere when emptying it!
As all the other reviewers have noted, the machine loses suction after cleaning a few rooms. You need to clean out the various filters every time you use the machine. If you don't - and no-one ever does it after having just used the machine - no suction at all. Which means that anytime you want to use the thing, you end up waiting a couple of hours for the filters to dry out.
MickPont's review and ratings | 205 words
Review by
zsucsibe
on 9th Nov 2007
User Rating : 0
Respect :
0
You need to clean the whole machine after each use, and I don't know why it designs a 3.5 litre tank when you can only use it once before it doesn't suck any more. My grandmother's vacuum cleaner works much better and that's at least thirty years old!
zsucsibe's full review | 106 words
Review by
Lazarus
on 12th Aug 2006
User Rating : 0
Respect :
0
The Panasonic MC- E8003 vacuum cleaner looks good and it is light and easy to carry. Unfortunately, you would get better suction from and asthmatic pensioner with a straw. It is the worst vacuum cleaner I have ever owned, and it is destined for the tip next week. I have just ordered a Henry on recommendation, so hope it is better.
Lazarus's full review | 61 words
Review by
Parrow
on 21st Apr 2006
User Rating : 0
Respect :
0
I paid almost £100.00 for the Panasonic MC-E8023 2000W model and am very disappointed with it. There is virtually no suction when using to clean carpets no matter how often I wash the filters. I am now having to buy another cleaner which will definitely not be Panasonic.
Parrow's full review | 52 words
Review by
cupra
on 11th Mar 2006
User Rating : 1
Respect :
+1
Just to add to the previous comments. I have bought the Panasonic MC- 8023 which is the 2000W version of the one mentioned here but with the same design.
It is absolutely amazing..... for about 6 minutes. Then it's completely useless. Its not a slow progression, it goes from a Formula 1 wind tunnel machine in a baby sucking through a straw like someone's flicked a switch.
6 minutes it's seriously how long it lasts before having to be disassembled, and completely cleaned out. You need to wait f ...
cupra's full review | 118 words | 2 comments added.
Review by
mmmmcupcake
on 1st Oct 2005
User Rating : 1
Respect :
0
I too have the Panasonic MC-E80003 vacuum cleaner, and I have had the same problem with the lack of suction. At first I thought "WOW this is good", but after 4 rooms it sucked like my old granny. I took it back to the shop and replaced it with a new one, only to find it happened again. Bad bad hoover. It has made an awful job into an almost tiresome one.
mmmmcupcake's full review | 83 words
Review by
alderny
expert review 
on 2nd Jun 2005
User Rating : 5
Respect :
0
Panasonic MC-E8003: Being one of her least favourite jobs, my wife occasionally delegates the vacuum cleaning to me. So, with some experience in hand, here's a man's review of that domestic utility, the vacuum cleaner.
We chose the Panasonic MC-E8003 partly because our previous cleaner had been a Panasonic and was very good, and partly because we thought a bagless system would be cheaper in the long run, as well as being environmentally friendlier.
This cleaner is physically compact, and a ...
alderny's full review | 358 words
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
