Have a picture of Sennheiser PMX 60 Headphones?, please send it to us.
| Sound Quality | 8.3/10 |
|---|---|
| Comfort Level | 7.7/10 |
| Value for Money | 8.3/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 8/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.8/10 |
| Sennheiser PMX60 Neckband Headphones | ![]() | £29.95Free P&P |
| PMX 60 headphones for CD, MP3 and MP4 players | ![]() | £27.00P&P: £3.90 |
| Sennheiser PMX 60 Consumer Headphones | ![]() | £29.95Free P&P |
| Sennheiser PMX 60 Consumer Headphones | ![]() | £27.00P&P: £3.90 |
| Sennheiser PMX60 Open Neckband Headphone | ![]() | £17.99Free P&P |
Full review by
Guest.
on 20th Jan 2008
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 6
Respect :
0
Good Points: Lightweight, good for jogging etc.
Bad Points: Uncomfortable to wear, unable to adjust them, not compact enough for traveling. Not particularly noise-canceling.
General comments: These are great and lightweight for sport, but not practical for carrying around in your bag as they don't fold. I didn't find they were particularly great at canceling out traffic noise etc.
Guest.'s review and ratings | 53 words
Review by
nickcushing
on 22nd Oct 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
I bought these specifically for using with my iPod while training for a marathon, and they absolutely fit the bill. The Sennheiser PMX 60 headphones are so light that you barely feel them, and for the weight the sound is outstanding. While the neckband is not the firmest fitting for headphones, I found no slip or bounce at all when running. Probably not the best sound reproduction for listening to audio at home, but for activities, absolutely spot on.
nickcushing's full review | 86 words
Review by
Mistameena![]()
on 8th Jan 2006
![]()
User Rating : 10
Respect :
+1
The Sennheiser PMX 60 headphones are superb! If you are looking for decent headphones, buy these!
Mistameena's full review | 37 words

Main characteristics: Connectivity: Cable Usage: Consumer Compatibility: Personal Audio Design: Behind the Head Sound Mode: Stereo Technical Frequency Respons More...
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?