| Ease of Use | 9.6/10  |
|---|---|
| Durability | 9/10 |
| Style | 9/10 |
| Service & Support | 7.8/10 |
| Value for Money | 8/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 9.6/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.3/10  |
Full review by
Guest.
on 14th Mar 2008
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
Good Points: Perfect. A work of art!
Bad Points: None.
General comments: There can't be a better vacuum cleaner than this one. We have had one for ten years and it is near indestructible. It is so easy to use and 100 per cent effective. Recently it broke down (due to heavy use) and Dyson sent round an engineer and fixed it for a minimal cost. Their customer service was exceptional. Don't ever think about getting another vacuum cleaner. Well worth the money.
Guest.'s review and ratings | 76 words
Review by
patriciagodfrey
on 16th Jul 2007
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
All round very good cleaner
patriciagodfrey's full review | 16 words
Review by
shorty422
on 15th Feb 2007
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
This is the best one out there. No other vacuum cleans like this one does. I thank you James Dyson for building a great Vacuums cleaner!!!
shorty422's full review | 78 words
Review by
spallan49
on 1st Dec 2005
User Rating : 10
Respect :
+2
If you have a small apartment then the Dyson DC15 is not the vacuum cleaner for you, as it's too big and bulky. That said, an average or bigger house with a dog or cat, or a seriously hairy husband, then you will love this piece of technology.
It surprises me when I hear people saying they did or didn't like the look of it. Who cares, it works!!!! I don't mind spending the dosh either, so as not have to stump up constantly for bags. Mom says my house has never been so clean. As for the dead ...
spallan49's full review | 192 words
Review by
rankNet
on 24th Mar 2005
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
The Dyson DC15's main feature is 'The Ball'. The Ball is said to revolutionize the way we clean our homes (it even claims to have the men doing it!) current price tag is £300 - £350.
rankNet's full review | 43 words
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
