Kodak EasyShare Printer Dock Series 3 Reviews

richardviled's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

This printer has good quality prints, no doubt about that. I used it a few times before and had good picture prints. I have to agree on the complain about this digital printer that you need to constantly plug it into a power outlet else, it will not last that long.
It's a total nuisance and quite annoying especially when doing fast printing. You could find other printers better than this one.

Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

The Kodak Easyshare printer dock is a simple to use photo printer that eliminates the need for ordering professional prints. I have used this for quite some time now together with a D-SLR. The prints really do look great and the printer works great with non-Kodak image editing software as well.

It should be noted that it advances the toner every time the power supply cable is connected, thus reducing the number of prints from the toner. According to Kodak it needs to be constantly plugged in in ...

aiddan0's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

Easy to use, good quality prints and colour. would recommend for frist time camera and printer users, cheap but good quality.

S Brown's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

I had THREE of the Kodak Easyshare Printer Dock Series 3 printers within ONE month! All of them had faults and had to be exchanged - by Comet, Kirkcaldy. The first chewed up the paper, the second chewed up the paper and then locked itself onto 'paper jam' and wouldn't release out of this state, and the third, which I had overnight (!) chewed up paper and the printhead was totally out of alignment - even when checked by the store - resulting in part printing and shadowed printing of each sheet ...

Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

Was bought a Kodak Easyshare Printer Dock Series 3 as a xmas pressie and have to say the camera and the dock give very good results. Aometimes i feel these 'big' companies try to make too many models in too quick a time and this is where the problems arise.a 40 pack cartridge/paper varies from £10 upwards, worth shopping around.

Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

We have found this printer good and good value for money but unfortunatly it broke after 4months of use. (Some kind of jam, has had to be sent back to kodak which has taken weeks)

Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

Have had problems with replace cartilage light on no matter what I do. Called Kodak and they were no help. Good when it works

Shansy's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

It's great for an emergency print but the paper and ink are far too expensive to use on a regular basis.

Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

The Kodak Easyshare Printer Dock Series 3 is a terrible product that the company refuses to correct. If you buy this product be prepared to spend hundreds of dollars in ink/paper combination kits that do not feed properly and never give you all of your photos. Sometime you are lucky to get a couple of photos for your $50.

Worse, the company refuses to do anything about this KNOWN LEMON. They will only offer to repair the piece of rubbish.

A MONEY PIT!

lexi11's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

I like it, the Kodak Easyshare Printer Dock Series 3 is easy to use, adaptable and produces prints of a good quality.

amurrayx's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
Report this review

I purchased the Kodak Easyshare Printer Dock series 3 because I figured it made sense to get a photo printer made by a photo company.

The bundled software is not the best available, but more importantly every photo printed so far has had at least one small area, sometimes many, where the dye did not transfer to the paper, leaving a small blotch of discoloration.
Such blotches appear randomly on any reprints of the same photo, showing an obvious problem with the quality of their dye transfer ...