Have a picture of Doctor Who?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of The Daleks.
| Value for Money | 7.2/10  |
|---|---|
| Reviewer Rating | 7.2/10 |
| Overall Rating | 7.7/10  |
Full review by
Guest.
on 12th Jun 2008
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
Good Points: Great Fantasy/SciFi Mixture! Cult Series! Twisted story arcs over several seasons and a lot of consistency with old Doctor Who series.
General comments: Doctor Who contains maybe too much fantasy and not enough truely scientific for the viewers, contains some non-logical features (intentionally)
Guest.'s review and ratings | 42 words
Review by
Tom H
expert review 
on 16th Feb 2007
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
Spanning three decades, Doctor Who was one of those shows that never failed to pull viewers. With rickety sets, initially poor editing, over-acting from guest stars and low-budget special effects bordering on laughable (green painted bubble-wrap was a favourite in the mid 1970's, and if you look hard enough in the old black and white ones you can see camera shadows on walls and even badly hidden boom microphones hovering above actors), somehow, it outlived the expectations of everyone.
Funny th ...
Tom H's full review | 539 words | 2 comments added.
Review by
blueroseuk
on 6th Aug 2006
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
The very first few episodes of Doctor Who in the early sixties, I find to be very slow moving. Good story lines yes, but it takes ages for something to happen. However, this problem is overcome quickly from here, and Doctor Who was arguably at its best until the mid-Tom Baker years (near the end of the seventies), although good episodes do occur in this period, to the end of the eighties, Doctor Who becomes silly. The show writers are weaker, and humour is attempted, but it more often than not f ...
blueroseuk's full review | 282 words | 1 comment added.
Review by
saltrampen2
on 3rd Aug 2006
User Rating : 6
Respect :
0
The BBC has generally done a good job bringing back Dr Who, with convincing sets, CGI and believable dialogue. Both David T and Christopher Eccleston are up there with the previous Doctors in the acting stakes. I felt a little let down with the second series in that the plots and locations in several episodes (not all!) lacked in originality.
There seems to be too many episodes set on earth in the period 1700 - 2015. I would like to see more alien planets and cultures. I also feel I have seen ...
saltrampen2's full review | 259 words
Review by
Charnelmind The Smart
on 20th Jun 2005
User Rating : 3
Respect :
-1
Dr Who was naff in the '70s and '80s and it's naff now. How can anyone find a giant dustbin with one arm the scariest thing in the universe? There's a reason that Christopher Eccleston was playing the Doctor like a goofy children's entertainer - even he couldn't take it seriously.
The effects were poor, but it didn't look deliberate. The acting was OK but the dialogue was pretty lame and the scripts which were meant to frighten and teach were just pedantic.
Next time, hand it over to the ...
Charnelmind The Smart's full review | 99 words
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
