Canon 560i

Canon 560i Reviews

WRITE A REVIEW

★★★★★

4.8 / 5

From 2 reviews

100% of users recommend this

Print Quality
Ease of Set Up
Value For Money

Overview
Reviews (2)
Media Gallery (2)
Prices

Media Gallery for Canon 560i

Latest Reviews

★★★★★

WRITE A REVIEW

Canon 560i

“I would recommend this Canon 560i to anybody out there...”

Written on: 19/02/2007 by clkaz (3 reviews written)

I would recommend this Canon 560i to anybody out there looking for a good printer for a smart price. This is the printer to go for as it is stylish, compact and quiet and produces great photos and documents. (read more)

Report this review

★★★★★

WRITE A REVIEW

Canon 560i

“I was looking for a good quality printer that was...”

Written on: 12/10/2004 by rbj1962 (4 reviews written)

I was looking for a good quality printer that was cheap to buy and run.

The 560i connects to a PC easily via USB. It does not have any slots to read memory cards directly, but it does have an additional USB input on the front if you want to connect up your camera and print using Pictbridge.

A big selling point for the Canon printers is the price of replacement cartridges, which are typically much cheaper than those from HP or Epson.

This printer takes four ink cartridges (a large... (read more)

411971_Techguru's Response to rbj1962's Review

Written on: 23/10/2008

I had the same printer and needed to switch to a more multi-tasking printer which should be best for bulk printing. Recently got a Phaser 8560DN from freeprinterpromo for free. The only catch is that you need to buy the supplies from them. But it is still well worth it after 6 months of usage.
<br/>

Reply to this comment

Techguru75's Response to rbj1962's Review

Written on: 23/10/2008

I had the same printer and needed to switch to a more multi-tasking printer which should be best for bulk printing. Recently got a Phaser 8560DN from freeprinterpromo.com for free. The only catch is that you need to buy the supplies from them. But it is still well worth it after 6 months of usage.

Reply to this comment