Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed Reviews

Click here if this is your business
★★★☆☆
3.1 / 5
From 4 reviews
25% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Scan Quality

  • Ease of Set Up

  • Ease of Use

  • Value For Money

? Ask our helpful community of experts about this product or company
Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed - Ask a question now

Media Gallery for Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed

Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed
Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed
Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed

Specification for Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed


Manufacturer: Canon
Features:
  • Up to 2,400 x 4,800 dpi hardware resolution for film and photos, 9,600 dpi interpolated
  • 48-bit internal and external color depth, 16-bit grayscale
  • Z-Lid design accommodates bulky originals
  • Film adapter unit for negatives
  • USB 2.0 interface, cable included; 1-year warranty with Instant Exchange
  • Refine your search

    Use the tools below to refine your search by only displaying reviews with a certain number of star ratings or to only show reviews from a certain time period. Eg click on '1 star' to just display the reviews we have which received a 1 star rating click or 'Within the last month' to display just reviews posted over the last month.

    • Average Rating Over Time
    • Within the last month ***** (From 0 reviews)
    • Within the last 6 months *** (From 0 reviews)
    • Within the last 12 months * (From 0 reviews)

    Latest Reviews

    ★☆☆☆☆
    Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed

    “Stay as far away from this POS as possible. Frequent...”

    Written on: 08/10/2009

    Stay as far away from this POS as possible. Frequent crashes of both the software and the OSX box running it. Had an interesting quirk where it would crash Photoshop CS2 every second scan causing constant relaunches. Difficult to figure out install instructions both in the manual and on screen. Tried on several different machines with different OS's never worked reliably. Currently in the recycle bin and on my way to buy HP. Canon will never see any of my money ever again… Read Full Review

    If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
    Report this review
    ★★★★★
    Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed

    “Who is to blame - Canon or Microsoft - for the fact...”

    Written on: 15/07/2007 by Kelleher (1 review written)

    Who is to blame - Canon or Microsoft - for the fact that no-one is able to upgrade the Scanner to work with Vista?… Read Full Review

    If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
    Report this review
    ★★☆☆☆
    Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed

    “See above points - Canon need to bring out a new...”

    Written on: 30/08/2004 by jaberdust (1 review written)

    See above points - Canon need to bring out a new driver for the Mac G5. The disc software AND the website softsite ware doesn't work properly… Read Full Review

    If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
    Report this review
    ★★★★★
    Canon CanoScan LiDE 80 Flatbed

    “I'll come clean...I am the casual user of Canon LiDE...”

    Written on: 21/12/2003 by cat1not2 (13 reviews written)

    I'll come clean...I am the casual user of Canon LiDE 80 Flatbed, in fact it is primarily just for old photos that I use this machine but I've found this easy enough and the beauty of it lies in it's simple one touch operation. It really was as simple as closing the lid and hit the scan button on the front. One note of caution...it comes with a stand to allow you to store it upright but I found this less stable than it ought to be and it nows lies flat… Read Full Review

    If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
    Report this review
    overview