
| Accommodation | 3.5/10 |
|---|---|
| Location | 8.5/10 |
| Food | 5/10 |
| Customer Service | 4/10 |
| Value for Money | 6.3/10 |
| Overall rating | 4.7/10 |
Full review by
micktu
on 29th Oct 2008
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 3
Respect : 0
Good point, proximity to tube and royal parks. Bad points, poor housekeeping. Room not cleaned during day. Slow at breakfast, crockery not clean. The Ramada Jarvis is not one of our favorite London hotels
micktu's review and ratings | 34 words
Review by
adampaine
on 26th Mar 2008
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 2
Respect : 0
The hotel is meant to be a 4* but I have stayed in better more up to date 3* hotels. Good Location and overall not a bad hotel but would not go back again. .
The rooms were Ok, again tired looking and we booked double rooms which are 2 singles put together so not greatly comfortable.
I have complained about the hotel but had no reply in 2 weeks which says to me the Hotel does not care about this problem. The Ramada is part of a large group called the Wyndham Hotel Group who franchise out their h ...
adampaine's full review | 117 words
Review by
Richard![]()
expert review 
on 28th Sep 2003
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 9
Respect : +1
I stayed at the Ramada Jarvis Hotel, Hyde Park for two nights with my family on a weekend break to take in some of the sights in London in September, 2003.
The hotel is convenient for both the Notting Hill Gate (slightly closer) and Bayswater underground stations. These are both on the Circle line which includes Euston Square (a three minute walk from Euston station).
Although we chose to take the train to London, there is parking for 30 cars (allocated on a first come first served basis) ...
Richard's full review | 560 words | 2 comments added.
