Panasonic RX-ED50 CD Radio Cassette Reviews

Watch this item
Panasonic RX-ED50 CD Radio Cassette
2.5 stars
Average rating for this product is: 2.5 out of 5

From 1 rating and 1 review

Thumb up 100% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

Average Ratings for Panasonic RX-ED50 CD Radio Cassette

  • Sound Quality4 stars
  • Battery Life2.5 stars
  • Value for Money4.5 stars
  • Reviewer Ratings4 stars
  • Overall Rating2.5 stars

1 Review For Panasonic RX-ED50 CD Radio Cassette

  • alloam Rank: Lance Corporal 4th Apr 2005

    Reviewer rating: 4 stars


    alloam's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review



    Good Points: Excellent sound quality
    Good volume level
    Double-cassette
    Aux-in
    Useful remote
    Not too heavy with good carrying handle


    Bad Points: Cannot cope with CD/RW disks
    No mp3 playback
    Blue-illuminated screen can be hard to read quickly


    General comments: I bought my Panasonic RX-ED50 three years ago and it has provided faultless service. The quality of sound is very good. I actually bought this instead of a BOSE CD/Radio as the quality of sound was good (if not quite as good) and it had many more features that I have found useful. The motorised CD-tray is a nice feature on a portable, as are the fully electronic control systems for the tape decks.

    I never used batteries, so my rating is a guess. However, the backup batteries did not run down in the three years since buying the machine. I used the main battery compartment to store the remote control!

    Sadly, I have just had mine stolen so I am looking to find a replacement, and as yet I have found nothing to match the features and tasteful styling of this machine. If only it would play CD/RW disks - a failing that has proved suprisingly annoying for my uses.

    None the less, I think I will be buying another as a replacement as it provides an excellent feature set, good sound quality, and neat design at a reasonable cost.