Polaroid Waterproof SL32F Reviews

Watch this item
Polaroid Waterproof SL32F
1.3 stars
Average rating for this product is: 1.3 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 6 reviews

Thumb down 17% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

Average Ratings for Polaroid Waterproof SL32F

  • Value for Money1 stars
  • Overall rating1.3 stars

6 Reviews For Polaroid Waterproof SL32F

  • proudmom 11th Jun 2007

    Reviewer rating: 0 stars


    proudmom's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review



    We took our daughter swimming for the first time and wanted pictures for the memories, so I bought a Polaroid Waterproof SL32F. I found out when I got the pictures developed and put on a CD that only 13 pictures out of a possible 27 were developed, let alone they didn't turn out very good at all. I noticed as well that absolutely none of the underwater pictures turned out at all, the negatives showed no picture where the underwater ones were. I'm very disappointed, how am I going to get memories of my daughter's first swim?

  • Lea Wright Rank: Lance Corporal 6th Jun 2007

    Reviewer rating: 0.5 stars


    Lea Wright's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review


    I bought the Polaroid Waterproof camera to be able to take some snap shots of my god-daughter going swimming for the first time in her life... but when I took the film to be developed I only got half of the film and even they were all blurred. Half the negatives where totally blank as though I'd never taken a photo at all... very disappointed as its now a moment that cant be repeated! I do not recommended anyone purchasing one of these cameras.
  • Asya 10th Apr 2007

    Reviewer rating: 0.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful

    Report this review


    We bought two Polaroid Waterproof SL32F for underwater walk in St Thomas. We experienced problems under water and out of 48 possible exposures only 22 worked out. Not impressed, can never get that adventure back. Not recommended.
  • jjsmith607 27th Dec 2006

    Reviewer rating: 0.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful

    Report this review


    Very disappointed :( Polaroid is such a good name for pictures. Right up there with other big names for single use cameras. Thought it was great that you could take it 32 ft under water, not that I did. Went scuba diving in a place I will probably never get back to and only went a maximum of four feet under and the camera got water in it. It is taking 3 weeks to even see if any of the pictures were able to be developed. Also, spent $24 Cayman dollars on it because I left my other brand nam ...
  • Sinbadsan 24th Oct 2005

    Reviewer rating: 1 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful

    Report this review


    The Polaroid Waterproof SL32F camera registered that all photos had been taken yet when it went for processing there were only 10 shots. The negatives showed that nothing had been taken at the start. Not impressed as the camera cost more but gave less when compared to cheaper cameras we have used.
  • ftfred Rank: Lance Corporal 15th Apr 2005

    Reviewer rating: 5 stars


    ftfred's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review


    I have tried a lot of single use camera my favorite is the Polaroid One Time Use ($4.75 only), it is not only excellent but waterproof as well.

    I also have a Single Use Camera for Weddings that you can put on your guest tables and they take the wedding pictures for you, it's a great idea!

Related categories