Have a picture of Reebok DMX?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of anthony johnson.
| Comfort | 4.7/10  |
|---|---|
| Style | 4.3/10  |
| Value for Money | 2.3/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 2/10 |
| Overall Rating | 4/10 |
Full review by
Guest.
on 16th Apr 2008
User Rating : 0
Respect :
0
Good Points: In my opinion there are no good points about this item
Bad Points: They are uncomftorable to run in
General comments: This item is not only extreamly over-priced its ugly, uncumfortable and useless
Guest.'s review and ratings | 29 words
Review by
shekharnishant
on 1st May 2007
User Rating : 1
Respect :
0
As far as value for money is concerned i would rank reebok shoes with -5 ...
If i am buying a running shoes worth Rs. 5k then i would expect it to last at least a year
Even if i am using it for running, mine started degrading in two months. Undersole of the shoes started coming out. Even being covered under three months warranty it wasn't replaced saying that
It was due to wear and tear.
shekharnishant's full review | 158 words
Review by
Suicide Pigeon
on 3rd Aug 2004
User Rating : 5
Respect :
0
I bought my Reebok DMXs at the start of 2001 and I still have them which says something. I bought them and use them as running shoes as well as doing a few other random sports like basketball or rock climbing. As running shoes they are very good at protecting your feet. The sole is amde of a hard plastic so you never feel stones or anything. However this rigid shoe deign makes the reebok DMX seem like the heaviest sports shoes ever. They are supposed to have a unique innersole that moves w ...
Suicide Pigeon's full review | 172 words | 1 comment added.
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
