Samsung Digimax 301 Reviews

Watch this item
Samsung Digimax 301
4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4 out of 5

From 1 rating and 3 reviews

Thumb up 67% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Average Ratings for Samsung Digimax 301

  • Value for Money4.2 stars
  • Reviewer Ratings4 stars
  • Overall Rating4 stars

3 Reviews For Samsung Digimax 301

  • littlemermaid20 2nd Jan 2006

    Reviewer rating: 2 stars


    littlemermaid20's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review



    Good Points: Cheap
    Nice size and good to look at
    A good make


    Bad Points: I found some parts difficult
    Some of the pictures don't turn out OK


    General comments: I bought the Samsung Digimax 301 digital camera very cheaply for Christmas. I have a few Samsung products, and I thought it was a good make, but I am a little disappointed with this, as most of the pictures, once developed, are fuzzy. I have lost some nice pictures of my new baby due to this.

    Also, no matter how the flash is set etc., every picture I take has red eye, even with the reduction setting on.

    It is still quite good, but it is no way near as good as I thought it would be.

  • nursecyndi 15th Apr 2005

    Reviewer rating: 5 stars


    nursecyndi's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    The Samsung Digimax 301 is very easy to use, couldn't ask for a better camera.

  • gangis Rank: Lance Corporal 16th Aug 2004

    Reviewer rating: 5 stars


    gangis's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    Samsung Digimax 301 - I took a gamble buying this camera without any research and am very pleased with the cost and features. I think I made a good purchase.

Product details

3.2-megapixel sensor captures enough detail to create photo-quality 10-by-14-inch enlargements3x digital zoomOptical viewfinder; 1.6-inch color TFT LCD monitorStore images on 16 MB internal memory or more details...