Umax Astra 1200s Reviews

Click here if this is your business
Umax Astra 1200s
★★★☆☆
3.1
57.0% of users recommend this
Click here if this is your business
  • Scan Quality

  • Ease of Set Up

  • Ease of Use

  • Value For Money

? Ask our helpful community of experts about this product or company
Umax Astra 1200s - Ask a question now

Media Gallery for Umax Astra 1200s

Refine your search

  • Average Rating Over Time
  • Within the last month ***** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 6 months *** (From 0 reviews)
  • Within the last 12 months * (From 0 reviews)

Latest Reviews

“I love this scanner, but I could not get it to work on...”

★★★★☆

written by morkys on 04/02/2008

I love this scanner, but I could not get it to work on my MSI Neo2 Platinum motherboard and AMD64 CPU based system. I tried too different PCI scsi cards and it won't work. Nevermind drivers, the PC itself won't even see the scanner upon boot-up. This was back in 2005. It's now 2008 and I am going to upgrade my PC again to another motherboard and CPU and see if through some fluke I can get it to work again.

This scanner isn't super fast, but it works really really well. Good quality scans overall. I just wish it would work with newer PC's. I would recommend looking for this older scanner, but I can't because of the compatability issue.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“I bought my Umax Astra 1200s in 1997, hsd lots of...”

★★★★★

written by matbot on 11/09/2003

I bought my Umax Astra 1200s in 1997, hsd lots of problems with specific DLL on win 9x, but NT/2000 solved it, and works fine
now i bought new motherword without ISA connector, so i changed it, but it still works fine after 6 years !

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“FAILED AT THE ONE YEAR MARK”

★☆☆☆☆

written by PV. on 20/06/2003

FAILED AT THE ONE YEAR MARK

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 0

“The Umax 1200S is sort of a perplexing machine. I've...”

★★★★☆

written by Erik Smith. on 23/02/2003

The Umax 1200S is sort of a perplexing machine. I've had it since it was new, and much though I'd like to upgrade and save the space this thing takes up, it's much too good to junk. The thing worth noting here, five years after I bought the thing, is that it provides better image quality than many of the lower-level scanners on the market today. I was so satisfied with the image quality on this scanner, for instance, that I decided to buy another Umax unit -- the 4400. But when I compared scans made by the two machines, the old scanner made images so much better than the new one that there really wasn't any comparison at all. I called the Umax tech support line, and the tech told me that I'd be a fool to replace the 1200S, that it was a much better machine, and that scanners just aren't what they used to be. So here's the thing. It's 2003, the 1200S is obsolete as the do-do bird, and it operates at a snail's pace by comparison with modern scanners. But if you want to pick up a used scanner with good image quality, and you're not really concerned about the speed of operation, or you need a backup scanner with legal-size capability, you can pick up one of these babies used on eBay for about $10. To make it work in a modern computer, you'll need a new SCSI card, because the original card was ISA, and most modern computers do not have ISA slots. With a SCSI-2 card, an adapter for the SCSI-1 plug, and a modern computer, the speed of this scanner will double, though it's still not up to current speed standards. The main drawback is that the new card and adapter cost me $35, and, well, that's about the third of the cost of a good modern unit (if you're a good shopper). So the bottom line is that the scanner makes sense primarily if you need legal-size capability, something most scanners today do not provide. But the scans are surprisingly good, and they certainly are better than the ones you get with today's bottom-of-the-line machines. Erik Smith

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

116641_Phil.'s Response to Erik Smith.'s Review

Written on: 18/07/2003

DO U KNOW WHERE I GET PCI CARD FOR UMAX ASTRA 1200S

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.

116809_Erik Smith.'s Response to Erik Smith.'s Review

Written on: 18/07/2003

Basically, any PCI SCSI card will work with this machine. Nowadays all PCI SCSI cards seem to be set up for SCSI-2, and the machine requires a SCSI-1 cable, but you can get an adapter that will allow you to plug a SCSI-1 cable into a SCSI-2 card.
<br>
<br>Some tweaking may be neccessary to make such a SCSI card work in a typical system, because the card that I purchased and the "sound blaster emulation" component of my sound card both insisted on using IRQ 5. I don't know if this is true for all SCSI cards, but man, what a headache!
<br>
<br>However, let me add something to this review that may change your perspective on the matter. Since I posted it, the world has moved on, and now there are better-quality USB scanners available for about $50 -- little more than the cost of the SCSI card and adapter (which cost me about $40). The scanners in the Epson 1200 and 1600 series are available as remanufactured units on eBay right now (July 2003) for about $50-$70. Images are much sharper than the UMAX 1200S, even when the same dpi resolution is used; the available dpi resolution is higher; the colors are truer to the original; the machines are faster (and if you spring for the 1660U, around $110 for remanufactured, $150 new, you get a 35 mm film adapter and fast USB 2.0 speed). So now there really is no reason to retain a UMAX 1200S if you have to buy a new card in order to make it work -- unless you absolutely have to have the legal-size capability, which the Epson lacks.
<br>
<br>Frankly, my opinion on the 1200S has changed, and I have to say that it was a good scanner in its day, but its day now is done.
<br>
<br>Hope this helps,
<br>
<br>Erik Smith
<br>Whittier, CA

Reply to this comment
If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 8 0

“These scanners are not exactly the fastest things you...”

★★★★★

written by Andy. on 18/02/2003

These scanners are not exactly the fastest things you can buy but they do the job a lot better than most of the industrial scanners that I have used. Easy to install, Easy to use, great quality descreens. Fantastic scanner.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 0 0

“I purchased my 1200S three or four years ago. It has...”

★☆☆☆☆

written by Xyique. on 23/12/2001

I purchased my 1200S three or four years ago. It has been working fine. I wouldn't know if it is slow or noisy because it's the only one I have owned. It does seem slow.

I haven't used it a whole lot and it is, or was, in mint condition until yesterday when it went south on me. The power converter went dead and I had to replace it with a Radio Shack model. The scanner's Mfgr. wanted $ 26. just to take a phone call for a simple question.

After replacing the converter, it makes a bad sounding, grinding noise and does not work. I'm going with HP from now on. They stand behind their products. I have several HP products and support has been superb.

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 1 0

“This is an older flatbed 26 bit color scanner. This...”

★★★★☆

written by Huer. on 20/05/2001

This is an older flatbed 26 bit color scanner. This scanner has been around for a while and has been used alot. It's slow but it meets my needs. I would prefer a newer unit, but this one works ok, and if I got a new one it would be USB and I would have this expensive SCSI card doing nothing. I do not know how much this scanner cost when it was new, because I got it for free. UMAX, I have been told, is a very good name brand. Yeah, I would recommend this unit- if you found one for cheap (They are not made anymore, I am sure).

If you are commenting on behalf of the company that has been reviewed, please consider upgrading to Official Business Response for higher impact replies.
Was this review helpful? 3 1

Do you have a question about this product or company? Simply type it in the box below and one of our community will give you an answer

Our helpful community of likeminded people will be happy to answer any questions that you have.

Thanks for asking a question.

Once we've checked over your question we will put it live on the site and our strong community of experts will hopefully give you some great answers that you find useful.

We will email you when the question is on the site

overview