iRiver iFP-140 MP3 Player Reviews in Best MP3 Players at Review Centre

iRiver iFP-140 Reviews

WRITE A REVIEW

★★★☆☆

3.1 / 5

From 4 reviews

50% of users recommend this

Sound Quality
Battery Life
Features
Value For Money

Overview
Reviews (4)
Media Gallery (3)
Specification
Prices

Media Gallery for iRiver iFP-140

Specification for iRiver iFP-140

Main Features
Memory	< 1

Features:

Supports MP3, WMA and ASF music files

iRiver Music Manager enables simple music transfers

Playback time up to 20 hours on one AA battery (included)

USB 1.1 interface

Supports files encoded at bit rates from 8Kbps ~ 320Kbps

Latest Reviews

★☆☆☆☆

WRITE A REVIEW

iRiver iFP-140

“I Bought the iRriver iFP-140 in November 2004, I have...”

Written on: 17/02/2005 by hnpppp

I Bought the iRriver iFP-140 in November 2004, I have had three, all due to a clicking noise when the remote is plugged in.

The iRiver is not easy to use unless you really know what you are doing. Support from Iriver is drastically lacking, and there are seldom any firmware updates.

The only way that I could get id3 tag info and playlists to work was buy using a program that another user had written. Even following iRivers own tutorial for playlists, step by step, they still did not... (read more)

Report this review

★★★★★

WRITE A REVIEW

iRiver iFP-140

“I recently purchased this IRIVER IFP-140, and in...”

Written on: 22/05/2004 by kknostman (1 review written)

I recently purchased this IRIVER IFP-140, and in short, it's the best hard drive based Portable MP3 player you can buy. There simply are no compelling reasons to puchase an ipod over this unit unless you simply MUST have the "ipod" for emotional reason, or because you find the ipods "wheel" superior to a thumbstick. Some may feel the ipod looks slicker, but that's not a functional issue.

Sound quality is better than an ipod (this was a subjective test between the Iriver and 2 ipods)... (read more)

Jerimiah797's Response to kknostman's Review

Written on: 11/11/2004

This is a really nice review - However, the model you are referring to is an iHP-140, not an iFP-140. There's a big difference. The iFP (which is the basis of these reviews) is a Flash-based unit with no recording, and it's much smaller and less expensive. Hopefully this clears up some confusion, rather than creates it.

Reply to this comment

Report this review Read 1 Comment

★★★☆☆

WRITE A REVIEW

iRiver iFP-140

“Pretty much the only good thing about the IRIVER...”

Written on: 06/04/2004 by hoodyfella (1 review written)

Pretty much the only good thing about the IRIVER IFP-140 portable mp3 player is that it is sold at a good price and has a great battery life. Besides this it stinks. Bottom line, the ipod is ten times what the iriver could ever amount to. (read more)

Report this review

★★★★★

WRITE A REVIEW

iRiver iFP-140

“I've owned this baby for eight months. Never...”

Written on: 18/06/2003 by Sikhi.

I've owned this baby for eight months. Never experienced any problems. The sound is great, lots of functionality, easy to use, and regular firmware updates that usually add additional features to the player. Oh yeah! one AA battery that last a long time. (read more)