written by ChrisBUK2 on 17/11/2007
I used this anti virus when I wasn't very up-to-date with anti virus products and I now know what a mistake it was!It is far too expensive at £35, when free alternatives have beaten it's detection rates.It was heavy on system resources and slowed down my family,s PC.It thought mIRC.exe (the IRC program) was a virus and kept deleting it.In the end I got fed up and un installed it. I used NOD32 on my family PC instead and it has been great for the last 2 years.I personally use Anti Vir myself which I highly rate.
written by ChrisBUK2 on 13/11/2007
I found Panda to be very heavy on system resources, taking ages to load up and generally slowing down the whole PC.It also kept thinking programs like MIRC were viruses, which obviously is not the case. I think they add legit programs to their virus list just to boast to other company's how many viruses it can detect, except many of them are not even viruses!It is also very expensive at £32 - this is insane! NOD32 is MUCH, MUCH, MUCH better for £25 - or if you don't feel like splashing out on an AV because you have experience, do what I do and use a free AV like AVG anti virus.
written by Nanookh on 06/07/2006
After installing the Panda Antivirus Titanium 2004 AV software on my PCs, they both started generating Application Event IDs 1006 and 1030 of source Netlogon every 9 minutes. The evaluation version of the AdminSecure software only updated the signature files for 24 hours. How on earth can one evaluate a product in such short a time?
Worst of all: e-mails remain either undeliverable or unanswered. Promising interface, but I doubt if the product is really as good as it looks
Do you have a question about this product or company? Simply type it in the box below and one of our community will give you an answer
Once we've checked over your question we will put it live on the site and our strong community of experts will hopefully give you some great answers that you find useful.
We will email you when the question is on the site