Have a picture of Renault Scenic 1.9 Fidji 1.9 DCi?, please send it to us.
| Performance | 9/10  |
|---|---|
| Practicality | 10/10 |
| Reliability | 9.7/10 |
| Value for Money | 10/10 |
| Reviewer Rating | 9.7/10 |
| Overall Rating | 8.4/10  |
Full review by
Guest.
on 5th May 2008
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
Good Points: Last of the "old" shape and Renault have had time to iron out the old niggles. I bought the auto version and am impressed with the smooth pick up.
Bad Points: Not quite as thrifty as the manual version.
General comments: This is my 4th Renault Scenic. Preceeded by 98 Monaco, 99 RT and 2004 new shape. For me, this is the best of the bunch with great trim. It has the curtain airbags, a nice safety feature.
Guest.'s review and ratings | 71 words
Review by
Dave Britton-Law.
on 29th Jul 2003
User Rating : 10
Respect :
+2
The car is fantastic. I always buy Diesels and prefer ones with Renault engines. The car is very economical, 42+mpg at 80+MPH, around town it drops to 37. If I 'nurse' it and drive around 55 to 60 mph the fuel consumption goes up to 51MPG. The car is as comfortable when I throw it around on the country roads as it is on the motorway - if only it had more power or I could afford a superchip..........
Dave Britton-Law.'s full review | 90 words | 1 comment added.
Review by
scott.
on 24th Apr 2003
User Rating : 10
Respect :
+6
Bought my Scenic in 2002 (June), first foray in to the Mini-MPV market, I'm not disappointed, Diesel engine is strong and willing with a good torque spread (more would be nice) and the car is proving to be a lot more economical than the manufacturers claims, I'm getting 50mpg as opposed to 47.9mpg.
The Interior is a bit of a let down, loads of cheap plastic, but hey its multi functional so lots to move about and get dirty.
Would I recommend one, well yes but wait until the all new Scenic arriv ...
scott.'s full review | 132 words
