Kodak DC3200 Reviews

Watch this item
Kodak DC3200
4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 11 reviews

Thumb up 82% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Average Ratings for Kodak DC3200

  • Value for Money4.1 stars
  • Overall rating4 stars

11 Reviews For Kodak DC3200

  • kamloopsboy 17th Sep 2003

    Reviewer rating: 3.5 stars


    kamloopsboy's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review



    Good Points: Simple to use (idiot proof), Fits in the hand good, LCD Screen


    Bad Points: No tripod mount, lens cover or memory card (even 4mb card would be better then rubbish internal memory)


    General comments: Kodak says the DC3200 is a 1.2 megapixal, but truly its a 995,000 pixal unit. Yah it takes relatively good pictures (very good outside, not so good inside), but what do you expect for $100 bucks or less. I would say spend the extra $50-$75 and get a 2 megapixal or better. But if money is a problem and you only want Ebay pix or for email, this is your camera. USB transfer of internal shots would of been better or a faster 4mb or better compact flash card would of been perfect. Probably why its discontinued. Anyway for me it works.

  • Prem. 25th Apr 2003

    Reviewer rating: 4 stars


    Prem's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    The Kodak DC3200 is a pretty good camera for a beginner. The pictures could be clearer for my taste, and less bright. It downloads slowly with a serial interface. The need to doctor almost every pic to decrease the brightness slows down the process greatly.

  • Sam. 15th May 2002

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    Sam's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    The Kodak DC3200 digital camera has good image quality for Email and keeping photos of friends and family. Even though it's only a 1 megapixel camera I think its pictures are very good.
    Not for professionals but for the rest of us it's a great camera.

  • Thomas. 28th Jan 2002

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    I just purchased a Kodak DC3200 for $60 (with a $70 mail-in rebate now in effect). My wife and I wanted a simple point and shoot digital camera for e-mail and to reduce our sizable photo processing costs. The DC3200 is a simple, well-made camera with limitations: LCD use really toasts batteries quickly, the artful subtlety of the flash is not unlike a 105 millimeter illumination round and the software is cheesy.
    That said, this is a wonderful buy. How can one go wrong for $60? I've used highe ...

  • Dennis. 1st Jan 2002

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    After seeing Georges comments I wanted to add some more. I did get the USB xfer at Best Buys for $29 for compact flash previously but didn't mention it as it wasn't standard with the camera. The xfer is fast and we use it over several networks with the USB adapter just hooked to one computer and it works just great.

    I have contacted Kodak but seem to never get an answer for a lens cover and haven't found one at a camera shop as of yet.

    If you cover the flash with one or two layers of 20 l ...

  • Dennis. 3rd Dec 2001

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    I purchased this digital camera for my daughter who will soon be 14 years old for a Christmas Present.

    It is extremely easy to use, almost goof proof. It is well worth the money and I only paid $88.50 for mine since it was the last on the shelf and a demo. I did get everything it came with as they had the box and all the unopened software, cables, etc.

    It takes good photos, but they can be over-saturated until you adjust to what setting you want for the white balance and flash. If you are ...

  • Digi Ian. 21st Nov 2001

    Reviewer rating: 1.5 stars


    On average, people found this review somewhat helpful
    Report this review


    This was my 1st digital camera, and I've now sold it! For general snapshots of a big area in good light, or with flash at a distance it takes OK shots. But taking pictures of anything specific that's smaller than say, a big dog, is a waste of time. You either end up with a big poor quality image or a too small to be useful image. You have to hold the camera incredibly still too, otherwise the image is blurry, and with no tripod socket it's tricky. And don't be fooled by the 1 megapixel quality e ...

  • D Mearns. 19th Nov 2001

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    Very pleased with my Kodak DC3200, excellent for a starter to digital cameras.

  • Darryl. 10th Oct 2001

    Reviewer rating: 3.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    Cheap and chearful digital camera that takes really good pictures and is simple to use. The camera is light and the rear LCD display is a very useful feature. Unfortunatly, the camera is ugly and bulky. It also has no tripod mount, red-eye or time delayed picture taking. The internal memory is pretty slow and it takes a while between shots, though if you stick a compact flash card into the camera the performance greatly improves. You migh want to invest in some rechargable batteries also as ...

  • Alastair. Rank: Lance Corporal 22nd Apr 2001

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    When I saw it in the shops, the DC3200 didn't appeal to me because it looks quite large and ugly. Appearance aside, it is a great camera for a great price. It feels solid and outdoor photos always come out crisp and clean, except in extreme lighting conditions. Unfortunately, the flash only works in a range of about 1.5 - 3.5 metres from the subject. Any less and it's ineffective; any more and the washout destroys your photo. Fortunately, the flash is usually unnecessary anyway because the DC320 ...

  • Kaso. Rank: Lance Corporal 28th Mar 2001

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review somewhat helpful
    Report this review


    Excellent camera for the money. They scrapped the all accessories to lower the price. Even lens lid is missing, you need to buy it separately. It costs them probably 2 pennies, which is annoying.