Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4 Reviews

Watch this item
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
4.2 stars
Average rating for this product is: 4.2 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 7 reviews

Thumb up 86% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Average Ratings for Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4

  • Sharpness4 stars
  • Value for Money4.5 stars
  • Overall rating4.2 stars

7 Reviews For Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4

  • Guest 12th Nov 2008

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review



    I've owned this lens for 10 years now, used on many different Nikon bodies, and its never let them down, awesome little workhorse of a lens!

  • Guest 26th Mar 2008

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    I have owned a Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4.0 for nearly 10 years, initially with my F60, and then moved it on to the newer D50 a few years ago.

    Great little workhorse, the range 28-105 is great so that you dont have to be swapping lenses every five minutes (unlike ithe useless 18-55 that Nikon supplied with the D50).

    It complemented very nicely my 70-300.

    Unfortunately the lenses has accumulated dust inside it for the past 10 years of work, and was prone to getting dust inside the workings, especiall ...

  • orionz3 17th Mar 2008

    Reviewer rating: 5 stars


    orionz3's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    The Sigma 28-105 lense is a sure bang for the buck! :)
    you get what you have paid for, it is lightweight, sharp copy, fast autofocus, and quiet on my d300 :)

  • TonyStIves Rank: Corporal 9th Jan 2004

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    I have had this Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4 lens and have been using it on my Fuji S2Pro for about 4 months now. It is a very good lens for me. I have had no problems with lens creep or other complaints I hear about. For a cheaper (about half the price of a Nikkor) it gives me great, contrast and sharp images from wide to telephoto. The zoom ring and controls are nicely placed and easy to use. The tulip "Perfect Hood" fits great and is a welcome, "Professional" touch, at no additional charge. I gave t ...

  • Guru. 2nd Mar 2003

    Reviewer rating: 4 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    I bought my Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 after purchasing my Nikon F60 with a standard Nikkor 28-70 D. The Nikkor was built so pooly, I had to upgrade. The Sigma is a nice lens to use, but, when manual focussing, it is quite easy to grip the focus ring tightly, causing the ring stick (I'm a bit heavy handed). If the ring was more rigid, I wouldn't be able to squash it. Otherwise, the lens performs well. My photos look as sharp as with any other lens.

  • joe c. 29th Mar 2002

    Reviewer rating: 2.5 stars


    On average, people found this review helpful
    Report this review


    My Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 35mm SLR lens has already required repair because the focus belt wore out after only moderate use. Sigma also has a problem with shapness consistancy. Some of these are sharp, some are very soft. Stick with your camera mfg 28-105.

  • Bill. Rank: Lance Corporal 5th Jan 2001

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    Objective data is available at www.photodo.com on this lens as well as many others.