Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4 Reviews

Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
WRITE A REVIEW
★★★★☆
4.3 / 5
From 9 reviews
88.9% of users recommend this

  • Sharpness

  • Value For Money

Media Gallery for Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4

B0000501TY.01.TZZZZZZZ.jpg
B0000501TY.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
item384.jpg

Latest Reviews

The-photoman

WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★★

Written on: 24/03/2012

“Excellent lens with great pictures”

Used this lens with Nikon and made great portrait pictures, especially in light challenged places. 28-105 give the right mixture of closeness and wide angle to shoot indoors are parties or other events....

Read full review
Report this review

nikonian

Reviews written: 11

WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★☆

Written on: 22/05/2010

“The sigma 28-105 F2.8-F4.0 is a good lense (mine is...”

The sigma 28-105 F2.8-F4.0 is a good lense (mine is for the ninkon (d)slr system. It comes with a hood (flowershaped) and has a metal lens mount . this is the better and more expensive brother of the 28-105 f3.8-5.6 UCIII Both lenses are small , though the ucIII is smaler and lighter than the f2.8-f4.0 lens. What i like is the f2.8 on 28mm (with my nikon dslr's it gives me a lense that acts like a 42mm - 157.5 mm in filmformat what i also like is the resopnsive ness of the lens , it...

Read full review
Report this review
WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★★

Written on: 12/11/2008

“I've owned this lens for 10 years now, used on many...”

I've owned this lens for 10 years now, used on many different Nikon bodies, and its never let them down, awesome little workhorse of a lens!...

Read full review
Report this review
WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★★

Written on: 26/03/2008

“I have owned a Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4.0 for nearly 10...”

I have owned a Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4.0 for nearly 10 years, initially with my F60, and then moved it on to the newer D50 a few years ago. Great little workhorse, the range 28-105 is great so that you dont have to be swapping lenses every five minutes (unlike ithe useless 18-55 that Nikon supplied with the D50). It complemented very nicely my 70-300. Unfortunately the lenses has accumulated dust inside it for the past 10 years of work, and was prone to getting dust inside the workings, especially...

Read full review
Report this review

orionz3

WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★★

Written on: 17/03/2008

“The Sigma 28-105 lense is a sure bang for the buck! :) ”

The Sigma 28-105 lense is a sure bang for the buck! :) you get what you have paid for, it is lightweight, sharp copy, fast autofocus, and quiet on my d300 :)...

Read full review
Report this review

TonyStIves

Reviews written: 4

WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★★

Written on: 09/01/2004

“I have had this Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4 lens and have...”

I have had this Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4 lens and have been using it on my Fuji S2Pro for about 4 months now. It is a very good lens for me. I have had no problems with lens creep or other complaints I hear about. For a cheaper (about half the price of a Nikkor) it gives me great, contrast and sharp images from wide to telephoto. The zoom ring and controls are nicely placed and easy to use. The tulip "Perfect Hood" fits great and is a welcome, "Professional" touch, at no additional charge. I gave the...

Read full review

Tukei Kennedy's response to TonyStIves's Review

Written on: 11/12/2009

I found this review helpful because...THE INFORMATION HE GIVES IS NOT EXAGGERATED. i MYSELF HAVE USED THIS LENS FOR 4 YEARS NOW AND HAVE NOT HAD ANY PROBLEMS. I HAVE ORDERED FOR A NIKON 5000 BODY ONLY ON WHICH I INTEND TO USE THIS LENS. MY FEARS ARE THAT IT MAY NOT BE COMPARTIBLE ENOUGH WITH MOST OF THE RECENT TECH ON 5000
<br/>

Report this review

Guru.

WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★☆

Written on: 02/03/2003

“I bought my Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 after purchasing my...”

I bought my Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 after purchasing my Nikon F60 with a standard Nikkor 28-70 D. The Nikkor was built so pooly, I had to upgrade. The Sigma is a nice lens to use, but, when manual focussing, it is quite easy to grip the focus ring tightly, causing the ring stick (I'm a bit heavy handed). If the ring was more rigid, I wouldn't be able to squash it. Otherwise, the lens performs well. My photos look as sharp as with any other lens....

Read full review
Report this review

joe c.

WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★☆☆

Written on: 29/03/2002

“My Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 35mm SLR lens has already...”

My Sigma 28-105 f2.8-4 35mm SLR lens has already required repair because the focus belt wore out after only moderate use. Sigma also has a problem with shapness consistancy. Some of these are sharp, some are very soft. Stick with your camera mfg 28-105....

Read full review
Report this review

Bill.

WRITE A REVIEW
Sigma 28-105 f 2.8-4
★★★★★

Written on: 05/01/2001

“Objective data is available at www.photodo.com on this...”

Objective data is available at www.photodo.com on this lens as well as many others....

Read full review
Report this review
overview

Share this page?

Business Owner?Claim your free Review Centre Star Rating badge now!