Raymond Murphy,Louise Hashemi, English Grammar in Use: A Self-study Reference and Practice Book for Intermediate Students: Supplementary Exercises with Answers (Grammar in Use S.) Reviews

Watch this item
Raymond Murphy,Louise Hashemi, English Grammar in Use: A Self-study Reference and Practice Book for Intermediate Students: Supplementary Exercises with Answers (Grammar in Use S.)
3.4 stars
Average rating for this product is: 3.4 out of 5

From 3 ratings and 1 review

Thumb down 0% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item

Average Ratings for Raymond Murphy,Louise Hashemi, English Grammar in Use: A Self-study Reference and Practice Book for Intermediate Students: Supplementary Exercises with Answers (Grammar in Use S.)

  • Value for Money3 stars
  • Reviewer Ratings2.5 stars
  • Overall Rating3.4 stars

1 Review For Raymond Murphy,Louise Hashemi, English Grammar in Use: A Self-study Reference and Practice Book for Intermediate Students: Supplementary Exercises with Answers (Grammar in Use S.)

  • amazin Rank: Lance Corporal 28th Mar 2007

    Reviewer rating: 2.5 stars


    amazin's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!

    Report this review



    Good Points: What is correct is clear enough, though prolonged and needlessly complicated.


    Bad Points: The new edition includes incorrect grammar, which mars an otherwise simple task.


    General comments: The inclusion of incorrect grammar only disrupts the study of what is a very simple yet comprehensive language, and only confuses its students.

    Do you teach that two plus two equals three? - Then why break the simple rules of this language which, in essence, consists of merely half a dozen clear and simple injunctions, with a few minor explanations to make it absolutely clear, particularly to Latin-speakers?

    I used to recommend Murphy's as the best all-round grammar book, but the re-edition has included much that is incorrect, and my criticism here reflects that.

    Why add unnecessary complication? This is a supposed to be a grammar book, not an illustration of the harm that has been done to the language consistently by these and other publishers over recent decades.

    It would be an error of judgement to distort any subject in its teaching if this were not perhaps the conscious intention of the publishers.