Olympus C-5050 Reviews

Watch this item
Olympus C-5050
3.9 stars
Average rating for this product is: 3.9 out of 5

From 1 rating and 4 reviews

Thumb up 50% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Average Ratings for Olympus C-5050

  • Value for Money3.9 stars
  • Reviewer Ratings3.6 stars
  • Overall Rating3.9 stars

4 Reviews For Olympus C-5050

  • Guest 26th Mar 2009

    Reviewer rating: 1.5 stars


    Guest's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review



    Good Points: Light weight and flat


    Bad Points: Difficult to use. Needs sometime to get use to it.


    General comments: Bought the Olympus C-5050in Singapore. Camera stop working when the surrounding temperature was -15 degrees Celsius in Beijing. Had to warm it up before able to use.

  • foswald 8th Jul 2004

    Reviewer rating: 5 stars


    foswald's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    I did several months of research in deciding to purchase a digital, 5+ MP camera. I almost decided on the Fuji S7000, but the image noise and lack of low ASA/ISO deterred me. Luckily, I found the Olympus C-5050Z. Okay, it does not look as *cool* as the S7000, but it more than makes up for it with performance. Before deciding, I spent hours comparing sample photos at various resolutions and found this model had very little noise and handles low light great, even without a flash due to the fa ...

  • Big. 11th Jul 2003

    Reviewer rating: 3.5 stars


    On average, people found this review somewhat helpful
    Report this review


    I have used this Olympus C5050 to shoot about 300 photos so far. Half of them where underwater. This is my first step up to the 5 mega pixel range. While I am impressed with the detail this camera can produce, I am still greatly disapointed with it. A few photos have come out spectacular but most are not due to camera flaws. I have to erase so many blurry shots. I have tried increasing the shutter speed. Tried different flash and f-stop settings and still I have gotten no significantly improved ...

  • Photoist. Rank: Lance Corporal 5th Apr 2003

    Reviewer rating: 4.5 stars


    On average, people found this review helpful
    Report this review


    Images quite good. Camera well weighted for good stable shots, despite being just a tad bulky. Use of AA batteries considered a plys especially on vacations for emergency power source. I use Ray O Vac one hour charge NiMH batteries (amazing!)The flash images seem washed out and too contrasty. I prefer to turn off the flash and use existing light. The white balance on this camera is excellent. There is always just a short delay between when a focused image is triggered and when the shot act ...

Product details

5.0 megapixel sensor creates 2500 x 2000 images for high-resolution prints up to poster size3x optical plus 3.3x digital (10x total) autofocus zoom lensIncludes 32 MB XD Picture card--also compatible more details...