|Max Resolution||More Than 4800 dpi|
|Film Scanning Capabilities||Flatbed Scanner|
Use the tools below to refine your search by only displaying reviews with a certain number of star ratings or to only show reviews from a certain time period. Eg click on '1 star' to just display the reviews we have which received a 1 star rating click or 'Within the last month' to display just reviews posted over the last month.
Written on: 31/08/2011 by ochenbraun (2 reviews written)
I have used HP 3200C Scanners. at that time i don`t have sufficient drive and software. then i searched a lot to find the driver software for this Scanner. The sharpness and the response is really good. After this i had brought two more scanner of HP. The best thing i like in HP scanners is their respond and sharpness… Read Full Review
Written on: 07/01/2011 by granric (1 review written)
Bought this HP3200c flatbed scanner some 10 years ago, in times of Win98 - it stayed idle on the bottom of a cabinet for 9+ years, both for my laziness to check for updated drivers and for the old-fashioned parallel interface.
These days, reviewing my own museum of over-aged hardware, I decided to give it a try. First played with some virtualization software (to little success), then I decided to go for an updated driver. Installed like a charm in a Win Server 2003 box, 600 dpi… Read Full Review
Written on: 12/07/2007 by susiej26 (1 review written)
I was given this scanner. When I try to hook it up and it tells me I need software or something like that could you please help me in setting up my 3200C thank you… Read Full Review
Written on: 13/12/2004 by retipuj17 (1 review written)
My HP Scanner 3200P does not work when I install Windows 2000 and XP… Read Full Review
Written on: 05/02/2002 by Mister Sunshine. (1 review written)
I couldn't help noticing the poor reviews of the Hewlett Packard 3200c scanner by others - I disagree.
The scanner produces perfectly good results considering the price of the unit.
I can't fault it at the price, and I can't really say that a more expensive scanner would do much more apart from offer increased resolution and image quality… Read Full Review
Written on: 23/11/2001 by joseph behrens. (1 review written)
i can do better with a cheap hand-scanner. Ive never been so disappointed with a peice of hardware. I took it apart, only to find that the bushings that the scanner slides on were nearly unlubricated. I oiled them and the rod and it got slightly quieter, and the image got slightly better. I havent torn down the electric motor yet, but if that doesn't help at least i'll be left with a really neat neon light… Read Full Review
Written on: 15/09/2000 by Ulrich Grassberger. (1 review written)
The driver installation has broken many times, I nearly gave up. I have much experience setting up computers, and this device has been my worst case yet.
Scanning is very slow, not because of the hardware but the terrible software. I have a 6 years old Mustek scanner that easily outperforms the HP. Besides, it temporary takes up twice the RAM the scanned picture has, and if you use the software wrapped inside a paint application like PaintShop, it is now 3 times the RAM size. Again my Mustek… Read Full Review
" Good hardware let down by bad software " Read More
Written by TonySomerset
" Mustek be@rpaw 2448ta plus mmjggcmnmkgg bnhc xgfdjhbhn,m hfvbfcgxbv... " Read More
" A little old now, but still a great standalone usb scanner " Read More
Written by Sickov_Anti-service
" I like " Read More
Written by ttteem
" Best repairs in town " Read More