Nokia 6190 Reviews

★★★☆☆
2.9 / 5
From 4 reviews
50% of users recommend this
  • Screen Quality

  • Battery Life

  • Features

  • Reception

  • Style

  • Value For Money

Compare Prices With Omio

Media Gallery for Nokia 6190

item300.jpg
item300.jpg

Latest Reviews

★☆☆☆☆
Nokia 6190

“I have owned this Nokia 6190 mobile phone for about...”

Written on: 18/03/2004 by lastmohican (5 reviews written)

I have owned this Nokia 6190 mobile phone for about 3.5 months and I keep cursing the day I bought it. It is practically useless as it does nothing right. The signal goes off as soon as you enter a building and sometimes even in the open! The screen turns off while trying to write an sms or when you press a button hard. As for its design... this must be the worst. I thought that coming from Nokia it should have something to compensate you for its large unfunctional size... but no no no! The... (read more)

Report this review
★☆☆☆☆
Nokia 6190

“This nokia 6190 phone is garbage. It sucks. It doesn't...”

Written on: 20/02/2002 by Jenna.

This nokia 6190 phone is garbage. It sucks. It doesn't have a vibrate feature plus my phone had to be takin in to get fixed becuase it keep breaking. This phone doesnt get a very good signal either. my screen has freezed many times, so basically this phone sucks. (read more)

Report this review
★★★★★
Nokia 6190

“I have owned the Nokia 6190 phone for over 2.5 years,...”

Written on: 15/11/2001 by Brian Digitmon.

I have owned the Nokia 6190 phone for over 2.5 years, and it has been working fine since day one ... way to go Nokia! (read more)

Report this review
★★★★★
Nokia 6190

“I've had this phone for about 2 years. It has served...”

Written on: 13/09/2000 by VTECMAN

I've had this phone for about 2 years. It has served me well. Even with a signal of 1, the phone remained crisp. The 2-way sms is amazing to use. It reminds me of icq. Very easy interface. There was a forwarding menu within the phone so I didnt have to memorize any star codes. All in all the best bang for your buck. (read more)

Report this review
overview