Goodmans GDC 3116 TFT Reviews

Watch this item
1.8 stars
Average rating for this product is: 1.8 out of 5

From 0 ratings and 9 reviews

Thumb down 22% of users recommend this product

Rate it Now:

Click on the stars above to rate this product:

Tweet This Item


Average Ratings for Goodmans GDC 3116 TFT

  • Value for Money2.2 stars
  • Overall rating1.8 stars

9 Reviews For Goodmans GDC 3116 TFT

  • grizlord 10th May 2004

    Reviewer rating: 1.5 stars


    grizlord's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review



    The Goodmans GDC 3116 TFT digital camera eats batteries like there going out of fashion. Software didn't work with XP as was advertised. Only lasted long enough for the 1 year warranty to expire then gave up the ghost for no apparent reason.

  • jim. 21st Apr 2003

    Reviewer rating: 2.5 stars


    jim's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    Generaly i like Goodmans products but have some reverance about this as the battery life is so small .I constantly keep a set of batteries on charge and have to take at least 2 sets of fully charged batteries with me. I have found that if you limit your use of the screen it gives you a little more time to take photoes. I have yet to get to the 201 image limit before the batteries die on me.

  • gullable al. 13th Apr 2003

    Reviewer rating: 1 stars


    gullable al's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    I BOUGHT THIS CAMERA AT AUGUST 2002 NOT EXPECTING AT MAYBE HAVING TO BUY SHARES IN "DURACELL". I HAVE BEEN TOTALLY APALLED BY THE BATTERY LIFE .YES THE PICTURE QUALITY IS GREAT, ESPECIALLY AT 3.1 MILLION PIXELS IT SHOULD BE, BUT EVEN AT THAT THERE IS AT LEAST A 10 SECOND DELAY IN EACH PICTURE YOU TAKE. SO ANYONE GOING TO BUY THIS PRODUCT PLEASE DON'T AS YOU MAY FIND YOURSELF SLIGHTLY ANNOYED JUST LIKE ME AND I AM SURE LIKE OTHER PEOPLE

  • steven. 21st Feb 2003

    Reviewer rating: 0 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    I paid £180 for my gdc 3116 tft or to use its other guise the mdc300, besides the battery life being of minimum life the software sent with cam, although supposed to be xp compatible does not work every time i down load drivers my pc crashes i would be grateful if anyone who my be able to assist would e-mail me, thanks steven

  • Emo. 23rd Jan 2003

    Reviewer rating: 0 stars


    Emo's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    Would be a good camera if it worked for more than 3 months without giving up on me!

  • gill. 22nd Jan 2003

    Reviewer rating: 1.5 stars


    gill's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    I got it for a Christmas present for my husband and feel awful it won't work

  • ricky. 10th Jan 2003

    Reviewer rating: 2.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    All in all a good camera. It takes nice pictures in the right conditions and is fairly easy on batteries. Menus are intuitive and the TFT is good quality. Bears much more than a passing resemblance to the Mustek MDC 3000 which costs £100 less. They are identical except for the name and the price, AND mustek provide online support.

  • naypam. 28th Dec 2002

    Reviewer rating: 3.5 stars


    naypam's review has yet to be rated - Be the first!
    Report this review


    Apart from the software not a bad camera.

  • stuart. Rank: Lance Corporal 25th Sep 2002

    Reviewer rating: 3.5 stars


    On average, people found this review very helpful
    Report this review


    At £149.99, any digital camera is worth a look, especially when advertised at 3.1 mega pixels. This Goodmans GDC 3116 TFT has web-cam capabilities (I haven't succesfully used the goodmans as a webcam yet, anybody?), TFT screen, is pretty small and has loads of space on the memory card that comes with the camera...

    After owning it for 3 months now, I am still wondering whether I should have put a bit more money into the idea, only because of the things I already stated - no XP support, t ...